cve.bz

CVE-2026-96064 Windows Domain Name Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

8.8 highEPSS 0.7%

High (8.8) in microsoft. EPSS 0.7% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days.

On this page
Heap-based buffer overflow in DNS Server allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Severity

CVSS 3.1

8.8 high
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS
0.7% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 53rd percentile. Scored 2026-11-13. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
CISA's assessment (SSVC)
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total, assessed 2026-11-10. From CISA's Vulnrichment in the CVE List: whether it is exploited, whether exploiting it can be automated, and how much control it gives.
CWE
CWE-122 Heap-based Buffer Overflow
Published
Modified
Assigned by
microsoft (CNA)
NVD analysis
Awaiting analysis
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-96064 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-96064?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-96064?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-96064 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Badge for a README or a site

CVE-2026-96064

An image that stays current: it is drawn from the data each time it is fetched (a host that proxies images, as GitHub does, may show its copy for a while). Markdown:

[![CVE-2026-96064](https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-96064.svg)](https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-96064)

HTML:

<a href="https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-96064"><img src="https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-96064.svg" alt="CVE-2026-96064"></a>

Affected

  • microsoft:windows server 2016
  • microsoft:windows server 2016 (server core installation)
  • microsoft:windows server 2019
  • microsoft:windows server 2019 (server core installation)
  • microsoft:windows server 2022
  • microsoft:windows server 2025
  • microsoft:windows server 2025 (server core installation)

Versions

From the CNA's record in the CVE List.

ProductAffected
Microsoft Windows Server 2016from 10.0.14393.0 before 10.0.14393.9688
Microsoft Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)from 10.0.14393.0 before 10.0.14393.9688
Microsoft Windows Server 2019from 10.0.17763.0 before 10.0.17763.9487
Microsoft Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)from 10.0.17763.0 before 10.0.17763.9487
Microsoft Windows Server 2022from 10.0.20348.0 before 10.0.20348.5870
Microsoft Windows Server 2025from 10.0.26100.0 before 10.0.26100.33822
Microsoft Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)from 10.0.26100.0 before 10.0.26100.33822

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

  • CAPEC-92 Forced Integer Overflow Likelihood: High · Severity: High

The attack patterns MITRE's CAPEC relates to this record's weaknesses, as MITRE names them. Credits.

References

Check your stackJSON