cve.bz

CVE-2026-67545 Heym: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in HTTP Workflow Node

7.4 highEPSS 0.5%

High (7.4) in heymrun heym. EPSS 0.5% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days.

On this page
Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.73, the HTTP workflow node in Heym makes outbound HTTP requests to user-supplied URLs without validation of the target host or IP address. If a workflow author has already configured an HTTP node that targets internal addresses such as cloud metadata endpoints or private network hosts, and exposed the workflow with anonymous execution, an unauthenticated attacker can trigger the preconfigured SSRF sink. The same project has comprehensive SSRF protection in its MCP integration, which is absent from the HTTP node. This issue has been patched in version 0.0.73.

Severity

CVSS 3.1

7.4 high
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
EPSS
0.5% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 42nd percentile. Scored 2026-11-13. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
CWE
CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
OWASP Top 10
A01:2025 Broken Access Control
Published
Modified
Assigned by
GitHub_M (CNA)
NVD analysis
Deferred: the NVD does not plan to analyze it
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

ChatGPTClaudeGoogle AI Mode

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-67545 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-67545?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-67545?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-67545 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Badge for a README or a site

CVE-2026-67545

An image that stays current: it is drawn from the data each time it is fetched (a host that proxies images, as GitHub does, may show its copy for a while). Markdown:

[![CVE-2026-67545](https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-67545.svg)](https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-67545)

HTML:

<a href="https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-67545"><img src="https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-67545.svg" alt="CVE-2026-67545"></a>

Affected

Versions

From the CNA's record in the CVE List.

ProductAffected
heymrun heym< 0.0.73

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

  • CAPEC-664 Server Side Request Forgery Likelihood: High · Severity: High

The attack patterns MITRE's CAPEC relates to this record's weaknesses, as MITRE names them. Credits.

History

  1. The NVD deferred its analysis

Changes since this site first stored the record. The same for every record: /api/public/changes.

References

Check your stackJSON