cve.bz

CVE-2026-44265

7.4 highEPSS 0.2%

High (7.4). EPSS 0.2% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days. Fixed in @enspirit/elo 1.0.1.

On this page
Elo is a purely functional expression language for no-code tools. Prior to 1.0.1, Elo's programmatic AST API accepts arbitrary values from JSON-deserialized input, plugin output, or other untyped sources and interpolates them into generated JavaScript, Ruby, Python, or SQL without runtime syntax validation. The affected fields are int_literal / float_literal .value, variable.name, member_access.property, object_literal keys, datapath segments, lambda.params[].name, and the SQL let binding name. Crafted values become executable expressions or identifiers, allowing arbitrary code execution in JavaScript, Ruby, and Python targets and SQL injection in the SQL target. This programmatic AST-object path is distinct from the plain-string constructor-chain sandbox escape. This issue is fixed in version 1.0.1.

Severity

CVSS 3.1

7.4 high
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS
0.2% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 16th percentile. Scored 2026-11-04. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
CWEs
CWE-20 Improper Input Validation
CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (SQL Injection)
CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code (Code Injection)
CWE-749 Exposed Dangerous Method or Function
OWASP Top 10
A01:2025 Broken Access Control, A05:2025 Injection
Published
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-44265 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-44265?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-44265?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-44265 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Versions

From the CNA's record in the CVE List.

ProductAffected
enspirit elo< 1.0.1

Packages (OSV)

AdvisoryEcosystemPackageAffectedFixed in
GHSA-x9rp-7wh3-2rj5npm@enspirit/elo<1.0.11.0.1

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

  • CAPEC-500 WebView Injection
  • CAPEC-35 Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executable Files Likelihood: High · Severity: Very High
  • CAPEC-77 Manipulating User-Controlled Variables Likelihood: High · Severity: Very High
  • CAPEC-242 Code Injection Likelihood: High · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-7 Blind SQL Injection Likelihood: High · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-66 SQL Injection Likelihood: High · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-108 Command Line Execution through SQL Injection Likelihood: Low · Severity: Very High
  • CAPEC-109 Object Relational Mapping Injection Likelihood: Low · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-110 SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter Tampering Likelihood: High · Severity: Very High
  • CAPEC-470 Expanding Control over the Operating System from the Database Severity: Very High

The attack patterns MITRE's CAPEC relates to this record's weaknesses, as MITRE names them. Credits. More on the page of CWE-20 (51).

References

Check your stackJSON