CAPEC-470
Expanding Control over the Operating System from the Database
An attacker is able to leverage access gained to the database to read / write data to the file system, compromise the operating system, create a tunnel for accessing the host machine, and use this access to potentially attack other machines on the same network as the database machine. Traditionally SQL injections attacks are viewed as a way to gain unauthorized read access to the data stored in the database, modify the data in the database, delete the data, etc. However, almost every data base management system (DBMS) system includes facilities that if compromised allow an attacker complete access to the file system, operating system, and full access to the host running the database. The attacker can then use this privileged access to launch subsequent attacks. These facilities include dropping into a command shell, creating user defined functions that can call system level libraries present on the host machine, stored procedures, etc.
On this page
Ask an AI about this attack pattern
Show the prompt
Explain the attack pattern CAPEC-470: Expanding Control over the Operating System from the Database: how it unfolds, what it needs and how to prevent and detect it in my systems. Use https://capec.mitre.org/data/definitions/470.html and https://cve.bz/cve/capec/470?via=ask-ai-copy, which lists recent CVEs with the weaknesses it exploits. Cite the sources.Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this attack pattern's id and public links.
How the attack unfolds
Explore
The attacker looks for a way in.
The adversary identifies a database management system running on a machine they would like to gain control over, or on a network they want to move laterally through.
Experiment
They probe what they found.
The adversary goes about the typical steps of an SQL injection and determines if an injection is possible.
Once the Adversary determines that an SQL injection is possible, they must ensure that the requirements for the attack are met. These are a high privileged session user and batched query support. This is done in similar ways to discovering if an SQL injection is possible.
If the requirements are met, based on the database management system that is running, the adversary will find or create user defined functions (UDFs) that can be loaded as DLLs. An example of a DLL can be found at https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/tree/master/data/exploits/mysql
In order to load the DLL, the adversary must first find the path to the plugin directory. The command to achieve this is different based on the type of DBMS, but for MySQL, this can be achieved by running the command "select @@plugin_dir"
Exploit
They carry out the attack.
The DLL is then moved into the previously found plugin directory so that the contained functions can be loaded. This can be done in a number of ways; loading from a network share, writing the entire hex encoded string to a file in the plugin directory, or loading the DLL into a table and then into a file. An example using MySQL to load the hex string is as follows. select 0x4d5a9000... into dump file "{plugin directory}\\udf.dll";
Once the DLL is in the plugin directory, a command is then run to load the UDFs. An example of this in MySQL is "create function sys_eval returns string soname 'udf.dll';" The function sys_eval is specific to the example DLL listed above.
Once the adversary has loaded the desired function(s), they will use these to execute arbitrary commands on the compromised system. This is done through a simple select command to the loaded UDF. For example: "select sys_eval('dir');". Because the prerequisite to this attack is that the database session user is a super user, this means that the adversary will be able to execute commands with elevated privileges.
Prerequisites
A vulnerable DBMS is usedA SQL injection exists that gives an attacker access to the database or an attacker has access to the DBMS via other means
Skills required
- High skill
Low level knowledge of the various facilities available in different DBMS systems for interacting with the file system and operating system
Mitigations
Design: Follow the defensive programming practices needed to protect an application accessing the database from SQL injection
Configuration: Ensure that the DBMS is patched with the latest security patches
Design: Ensure that the DBMS login used by the application has the lowest possible level of privileges in the DBMS
Design: Ensure that DBMS runs with the lowest possible level of privileges on the host machine and that it runs as a separate user
Usage: Do not use the DBMS machine for anything else other than the database
Usage: Do not place any trust in the database host on the internal network. Authenticate and validate all network activity originating from the database host.
Usage: Use an intrusion detection system to monitor network connections and logs on the database host.
Implementation: Remove / disable all unneeded / unused functions of the DBMS system that may allow an attacker to elevate privileges if compromised
Weaknesses it exploits
- CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command
- CWE-250 Execution with Unnecessary Privileges
Recent CVEs with these weaknesses
- 9.8CVE-2026-121653
SQL injection in the Core of Ivanti Endpoint Manager before version 2024 SU8 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution.
- 7.7CVE-2026-125759
Nango before 0.71.3 contains an sql injection vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary SQL by supplying a crafted task group key to the orchestrator API. Attackers can send a malicious group.key to POST /v1/…
- 7.2CVE-2026-12572
Zoho Corporation ManageEngine DDI Central version below 6201 is vulnerable to SQL injection in HA replication username handling leading to command execution as the PostgreSQL service account.
- 8.8CVE-2026-125612
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command ('SQL injection') vulnerability in Deltaww DIAEnergie allows SQL Injection. This issue affects DIAEnergie: before 1.11.01.032.
- 6.0CVE-2026-125381
DataRoom through 3.0.0 contains an sql injection vulnerability in MyBatisService.generateSql that allows sharer-role users to inject SQL by supplying crafted dataset parameters. Attackers can send crafted inputParam values to /dataRoom/dat…
- 9.3CVE-2026-115934
An unauthenticated SQL injection can occur on the front end of any site that uses craft.search to perform a search, allowing stacked query execution and enabling escalation to an administrator. Note that this only affects MySQL/MariaDB.…
- 4.3CVE-2026-123810
Dynatrace MCP Server is an MCP server for Dynatrace Observability. Prior to 2.1.1, several read capabilities interpolate caller-controlled values into DQL without sufficient validation or escaping. The src/capabilities/find-monitored-entit…
- 8.5CVE-2026-121769
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in axew3.com WP w3all phpBB wp-w3all-phpbb-integration allows SQL Injection.This issue affects WP w3all phpBB: from n/a through 3.1.9.
The newest records naming one of them. Each weakness's page lists them all.
Related attack patterns
- Part of
- CAPEC-66 SQL Injection
MITRE's words, unchanged: CAPEC-470 at MITRE. CAPEC is Copyright © 2007–2026, The MITRE Corporation, used under the CAPEC terms of use: “The MITRE Corporation (MITRE) hereby grants you a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC™) for research, development, and commercial purposes. Any copy you make for such purposes is authorized provided that you reproduce MITRE’s copyright designation and this license in any such copy.” CAPEC and the CAPEC logo are trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Credits. All attack patterns.