P-Net before 1.0.4 aborts the Application Relationship of an RPC session when a fragment of a response has been resent without being acknowledged, without checking that the session has an Application Relationship. A request for an existing Application Relationship that is sent on another activity than its Connect, and gets a fragmented response, is handled on a session without one. If the response is not acknowledged, a NULL pointer is dereferenced and the device crashes. A conformant IO-controller does not send such requests. The attacker must have observed the AR UUID of an established Application Relationship and requires ADJACENT network access.
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial, assessed 2026-11-13. From CISA's Vulnrichment in the CVE List: whether it is exploited, whether exploiting it can be automated, and how much control it gives.
Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-127125 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-127125?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-127125?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-127125 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.
Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.
Badge for a README or a site
An image that stays current: it is drawn from the data each time it is fetched (a host that proxies images, as GitHub does, may show its copy for a while). Markdown: