cve.bz

CVE-2026-119923 Heap-based Buffer Overflow

9.3 criticalEPSS 0.6%

Critical (9.3). EPSS 0.6% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days.

On this page
A heap-based buffer overflow in the TDS prelogin parser in the Babelfish for PostgreSQL extension versions 1.0-1.5, 2.1-2.15, 3.1-3.12, 4.0-4.8, 5.1-5.4 and in Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfish might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as the database process user via a specially crafted malformed TDS prelogin packet to the TDS port. This record consolidates a related NULL-pointer-dereference finding in the same prelogin parser. To remediate this issue, we recommend users upgrade to Babelfish for PostgreSQL extension versions 4.10, 5.6, 6.1 or later. As a workaround, restrict network access to the TDS port (default 1433). Customers using Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfish should upgrade their cluster to Aurora PostgreSQL 13.9.16 (1.5.5), 13.23.3 (1.17.2), 14.6.16 (2.3.5), 14.17.8 (2.12.4), 14.18.6 (2.13.3), 14.19.5 (2.14.2), 14.20.5 (2.15.2), 14.22.3 (2.16.1), 14.23.1 (2.17.0), 15.10.8 (3.8.4), 15.12.8 (3.9.4), 15.13.6 (3.10.3), 15.14.5 (3.11.2), 15.15.5 (3.12.2), 15.17.3 (3.13.1), 15.18.1 (3.14.0), 16.8.8 (4.5.5), 16.9.6 (4.6.3), 16.10.5 (4.7.2), 16.11.5 (4.8.2), 16.13.3 (4.9.1), 16.14.1 (4.10.0), 17.4.8 (5.1.4), 17.5.6 (5.2.3), 17.6.5 (5.3.2), 17.7.5 (5.4.2), 17.9.3 (5.5.1), 17.10.1 (5.6.0), 18.3.4 (6.0.2), 18.4.1 (6.1.0) or later, and apply any pending maintenance to ensure they are on the latest patch.

Severity

CVSS 4.0

9.3 critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

CVSS 3.1

9.8 critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS
0.6% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 50th percentile. Scored 2026-11-13. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
CISA's assessment (SSVC)
Exploitation: none · Automatable: yes · Technical impact: total, assessed 2026-11-06. From CISA's Vulnrichment in the CVE List: whether it is exploited, whether exploiting it can be automated, and how much control it gives.
CWE
CWE-122 Heap-based Buffer Overflow
Published
Modified
NVD analysis
Awaiting analysis
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-119923 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-119923?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-119923?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-119923 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Badge for a README or a site

CVE-2026-119923

An image that stays current: it is drawn from the data each time it is fetched (a host that proxies images, as GitHub does, may show its copy for a while). Markdown:

[![CVE-2026-119923](https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-119923.svg)](https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-119923)

HTML:

<a href="https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-119923"><img src="https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-119923.svg" alt="CVE-2026-119923"></a>

Affected

Versions

From the CNA's record in the CVE List.

ProductAffected
AWS babelfish-for-postgresqlfrom 1.0 through 1.5
AWS babelfish-for-postgresqlfrom 2.1 through 2.15
AWS babelfish-for-postgresqlfrom 3.1 through 3.12
AWS babelfish-for-postgresqlfrom 4.0 through 4.8
AWS babelfish-for-postgresqlfrom 5.1 through 5.4
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfishfrom 1.0.0 before 1.5.5
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfishfrom 1.6.0 before 1.17.2
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfishfrom 2.0.0 before 2.3.5
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfishfrom 2.4.0 before 2.12.4
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfishfrom 2.13.0 before 2.13.3
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfishfrom 2.14.0 before 2.14.2
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfishfrom 2.15.0 before 2.15.2
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfishfrom 2.16.0 before 2.16.1
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfishfrom 3.0.0 before 3.8.4
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfishfrom 3.9.0 before 3.9.4
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfishfrom 3.10.0 before 3.10.3
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfishfrom 3.11.0 before 3.11.2
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfishfrom 3.12.0 before 3.12.2
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfishfrom 3.13.0 before 3.13.1
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfishfrom 4.0.0 before 4.5.5
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfishfrom 4.6.0 before 4.6.3
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfishfrom 4.7.0 before 4.7.2
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfishfrom 4.8.0 before 4.8.2
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfishfrom 4.9.0 before 4.9.1
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfishfrom 5.0.0 before 5.1.4
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfishfrom 5.2.0 before 5.2.3
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfishfrom 5.3.0 before 5.3.2
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfishfrom 5.4.0 before 5.4.2
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfish5.5.0
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with Babelfishfrom 6.0.0 before 6.0.2

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

  • CAPEC-92 Forced Integer Overflow Likelihood: High · Severity: High

The attack patterns MITRE's CAPEC relates to this record's weaknesses, as MITRE names them. Credits.

References

Check your stackJSON