CVSS 4.0
7.1 highCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NCVE-2026-103980 ideon: SSRF protection bypass via IPv6 transition addresses (NAT64 / 6to4 / IPv4-mapped) in link preview
High (7.1) in 3xpyth0n ideon. EPSS 0.3% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days.
On this page
ideon is a self-hosted visual workspace. Prior to version 0.9.6, the SSRF protection in safeFetch is bypassed by IPv6 transition addresses that embed private IPv4 addresses. The isPrivateIP function in src/app/lib/ssrf.ts checks only a narrow set of IPv6 ranges (loopback ::1, ULA fc/fd, link-local fe80) but does not recognize IPv4-mapped (::ffff:), NAT64 well-known (64:ff9b::/96, RFC 6052), NAT64 local-use (64:ff9b:1::/48, RFC 8215), 6to4 (2002::/16, RFC 3056), or Teredo (2001::/32, RFC 4380) encodings. An authenticated user can supply these addresses in link URLs to reach cloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254), localhost services, and RFC 1918 internal networks through the link preview metadata fetcher. This issue has been patched in version 0.9.6.
Severity
- EPSS
- 0.3% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 27th percentile. Scored 2026-11-13. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
- CWE
- CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
- OWASP Top 10
- A01:2025 Broken Access Control
- Published
- Modified
- Assigned by
- GitHub_M (CNA)
- NVD analysis
- Deferred: the NVD does not plan to analyze it
- Record from
- the NVD, synced
Ask an AI about this CVE
Show the prompt
Explain CVE-2026-103980 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-103980?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-103980?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-103980 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.
Badge for a README or a site
An image that stays current: it is drawn from the data each time it is fetched (a host that proxies images, as GitHub does, may show its copy for a while). Markdown:
[](https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-103980)
HTML:
<a href="https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-103980"><img src="https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-103980.svg" alt="CVE-2026-103980"></a>
Affected
Versions
From the CNA's record in the CVE List.
| Product | Affected |
|---|---|
| 3xpyth0n ideon | < 0.9.6 |
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- CAPEC-664 Server Side Request Forgery Likelihood: High · Severity: High
The attack patterns MITRE's CAPEC relates to this record's weaknesses, as MITRE names them. Credits.
History
- The NVD deferred its analysis
Changes since this site first stored the record. The same for every record: /api/public/changes.