cve.bz

CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound (Year 2038 problem, Y2K38, Y2038, Epochalypse), page 63

Filter

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

What the weakness is: CWE-190 at MITRE

Ask an AI about CWE-190

Show the promptExplain CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound and how to prevent and detect it in code. Use https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/190.html and https://cve.bz/cve/cwe/190?via=ask-ai-copy for recent CVEs with this weakness. Cite the sources.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this weakness's id and public links.

  1. 7.5CVE-2018-13493EPSS 1.0%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for DaddyToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  2. 7.5CVE-2018-13492EPSS 1.3%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for naga, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  3. 7.5CVE-2018-13491EPSS 1.0%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Carrot, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  4. 7.5CVE-2018-13490EPSS 1.0%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for FILM, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  5. 7.5CVE-2018-13489EPSS 1.0%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for OllisCoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  6. 7.5CVE-2018-13488EPSS 1.0%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Crypto Alley Shares (CAST), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  7. 7.5CVE-2018-13487EPSS 1.0%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for PlatoToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  8. 7.5CVE-2018-13486EPSS 1.0%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for HELP, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  9. 7.5CVE-2018-13485EPSS 1.0%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BitcoinAgileToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  10. 7.5CVE-2018-13484EPSS 1.0%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for CBRToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  11. 7.5CVE-2018-13483EPSS 1.0%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for mkethToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  12. 7.5CVE-2018-13482EPSS 1.0%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ETHERCASH (ETC), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  13. 7.5CVE-2018-13481EPSS 1.1%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for TRIUM, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  14. 7.5CVE-2018-13480EPSS 1.1%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for QRG, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  15. 7.5CVE-2018-13479EPSS 1.1%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for SlidebitsToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  16. 7.5CVE-2018-13478EPSS 1.1%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for DMPToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  17. 7.5CVE-2018-13477EPSS 1.1%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for CTESale, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  18. 7.5CVE-2018-13476EPSS 1.1%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for PhilCoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  19. 7.5CVE-2018-13475EPSS 1.1%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for VSCToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  20. 7.5CVE-2018-13474EPSS 1.1%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for FansChainToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  21. 7.5CVE-2018-13473EPSS 1.1%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ohni_2 (OHNI), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  22. 7.5CVE-2018-13472EPSS 1.1%

    The mint function of a smart contract implementation for CloutToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  23. 7.5CVE-2018-13471EPSS 1.1%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BeyondCashToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  24. 7.5CVE-2018-13470EPSS 1.1%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BuyerToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  25. 7.5CVE-2018-13469EPSS 1.1%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for IcoContract, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  26. 7.5CVE-2018-13468EPSS 1.1%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Cavecoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  27. 7.5CVE-2018-13467EPSS 1.1%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for EpiphanyCoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  28. 7.5CVE-2018-13466EPSS 1.1%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Crystals, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  29. 7.5CVE-2018-13465EPSS 1.1%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for PaulyCoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  30. 7.5CVE-2018-13464EPSS 1.1%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for t_swap, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  31. 7.5CVE-2018-13463EPSS 1.0%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for T-Swap-Token (T-S-T), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  32. 7.5CVE-2018-13462EPSS 1.1%

    The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for MoonToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

  33. 7.8CVE-2018-5907EPSS 0.2%

    Possible buffer overflow in msm_adsp_stream_callback_put due to lack of input validation of user-provided data that leads to integer overflow in all Android releases(Android for MSM, Firefox OS for MSM, QRD Android) from CAF using the Linu…

  34. 9.8CVE-2018-3586EPSS 0.6%

    An integer overflow to buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the ADSPRPC heap manager in all Android releases(Android for MSM, Firefox OS for MSM, QRD Android) from CAF using the Linux kernel.

  35. 7.8CVE-2018-11304EPSS 0.2%

    Possible buffer overflow in msm_adsp_stream_callback_put due to lack of input validation of user-provided data that leads to integer overflow in all Android releases(Android for MSM, Firefox OS for MSM, QRD Android) from CAF using the Linu…

  36. 7.8CVE-2018-5898EPSS 0.2%

    Integer overflow can occur in msm_pcm_adsp_stream_cmd_put() function if the user supplied data "param_length" goes beyond certain limit in Android releases from CAF using the linux kernel (Android for MSM, Firefox OS for MSM, QRD Android) …

  37. 8.8CVE-2018-5875EPSS 0.8%

    While parsing an mp4 file, an integer overflow leading to a buffer overflow can occur in Snapdragon Automobile, Snapdragon Mobile and Snapdragon Wear.

  38. 7.5CVE-2018-3577EPSS 0.8%

    While processing fragments, when the fragment count becomes very large, an integer overflow leading to a buffer overflow can occur in Android releases from CAF using the linux kernel (Android for MSM, Firefox OS for MSM, QRD Android) befor…

  39. 7.8CVE-2018-13406EPSS 0.5%

    An integer overflow in the uvesafb_setcmap function in drivers/video/fbdev/uvesafb.c in the Linux kernel before 4.17.4 could result in local attackers being able to crash the kernel or potentially elevate privileges because kmalloc_array i…

  40. 9.8CVE-2018-13347EPSS 2.7%

    mpatch.c in Mercurial before 4.6.1 mishandles integer addition and subtraction, aka OVE-20180430-0002.

  41. 7.5CVE-2018-13328EPSS 0.9%

    The transfer, transferFrom, and mint functions of a smart contract implementation for PFGc, an Ethereum token, have an integer overflow.

  42. 7.5CVE-2018-13327EPSS 1.2%

    The transfer and transferFrom functions of a smart contract implementation for ChuCunLingAIGO (CCLAG), an Ethereum token, have an integer overflow. NOTE: this has been disputed by a third party.

  43. 7.5CVE-2018-13326EPSS 1.2%

    The transfer and transferFrom functions of a smart contract implementation for Bittelux (BTX), an Ethereum token, have an integer overflow. NOTE: this has been disputed by a third party.

  44. 7.5CVE-2018-13325EPSS 0.9%

    The _sell function of a smart contract implementation for GROWCHAIN (GROW), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow.

  45. 7.5CVE-2018-13233EPSS 1.0%

    The sell function of a smart contract implementation for GSI, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow in which "amount * sellPrice" can be zero, consequently reducing a seller's assets.

  46. 7.5CVE-2018-13232EPSS 1.0%

    The sell function of a smart contract implementation for ENTER (ENTR) (Contract Name: EnterCoin), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow in which "amount * sellPrice" can be zero, consequently reducing a seller's assets.

  47. 7.5CVE-2018-13231EPSS 1.0%

    The sell function of a smart contract implementation for ENTER (ENTR) (Contract Name: EnterToken), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow in which "amount * sellPrice" can be zero, consequently reducing a seller's assets.

  48. 7.5CVE-2018-13230EPSS 1.0%

    The sell function of a smart contract implementation for DestiNeed (DSN), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow in which "amount * sellPrice" can be zero, consequently reducing a seller's assets.

  49. 7.5CVE-2018-13229EPSS 1.0%

    The sell function of a smart contract implementation for RiptideCoin (RIPT), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow in which "amount * sellPrice" can be zero, consequently reducing a seller's assets.

  50. 7.5CVE-2018-13228EPSS 1.0%

    The sell function of a smart contract implementation for Crowdnext (CNX), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow in which "amount * sellPrice" can be zero, consequently reducing a seller's assets.