CAPEC-700
Network Boundary Bridging
An adversary which has gained elevated access to network boundary devices may use these devices to create a channel to bridge trusted and untrusted networks. Boundary devices do not necessarily have to be on the network’s edge, but rather must serve to segment portions of the target network the adversary wishes to cross into.
On this page
Network boundary devices are network devices such as routers and firewalls which segment networks by restricting certain types of traffic from flowing through the device. Network boundary devices are often directly accessible through a portal page for management purposes. An adversary’s goal when conducting network boundary bridging is to connect networks which are being segmented by the device. To do so, the adversary must first compromise the network boundary device.
Ask an AI about this attack pattern
Show the prompt
Explain the attack pattern CAPEC-700: Network Boundary Bridging: how it unfolds, what it needs and how to prevent and detect it in my systems. Use https://capec.mitre.org/data/definitions/700.html and https://cve.bz/cve/capec/700?via=ask-ai-copy, which lists recent CVEs with the weaknesses it exploits. Cite the sources.Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this attack pattern's id and public links.
How the attack unfolds
Explore
The attacker looks for a way in.
[Identify potential targets] An adversary identifies network boundary devices that can be compromised.
1 technique
- The adversary traces network traffic to identify which devices the traffic flows through. Additionally, the adversary can identify devices using fingerprinting methods or locating the management page to determine identifying information about the device.
Experiment
They probe what they found.
[Compromise targets] The adversary must compromise the identified targets in the previous step.
2 techniques
- Once the device is identified, the adversary can attempt to input known default credentials for the device to gain access to the management console.
- Adversaries with sufficient identifying knowledge about the target device can exploit known vulnerabilities in network devices to obtain administrative access.
Exploit
They carry out the attack.
[Bridge Networks] The adversary changes the configuration of the compromised network device to connect the networks the device was segmenting. Depending on the type of network boundary device and its capabilities, bridging can be implemented using various methods.
2 techniques
- The adversary can abuse Network Address Translation (NAT) in firewalls and routers to manipulate traffic flow to their own design. With control of the network device, the adversary can manipulate NAT by either using existing configurations or creating their own to allow two previously unconnected networks to communicate.
- Some network devices can be configured to become a proxy server. Adversaries can set up or exploit an existing proxy server on compromised network devices to create a bridge between separate networks.
Prerequisites
The adversary must have control of a network boundary device.
Skills required
- Medium skill
The adversary must understand how to manage the target network device to create or edit policies which will bridge networks.
Resources required
The adversary requires either high privileges or full control of a boundary device on a target network.
Consequences
| Impact | Affects | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Read Data, Bypass Protection Mechanism | Confidentiality, Access Control | |
| Alter Execution Logic, Hide Activities | Integrity, Authorization |
Mitigations
Design: Ensure network devices are storing credentials in encrypted stores
Design: Follow the principle of least privilege and restrict administrative duties to as few accounts as possible. Ensure these privileged accounts are secured with strong credentials which do not overlap with other network devices.
Configuration: When possible, configure network boundary devices to use MFA.
Configuration: Change the default configuration for network devices to harden their security profiles. Default configurations are often enabled with insecure features to allow ease of installation and management. However, these configurations can be easily discovered and exploited by adversaries.
Implementation: Perform integrity checks on audit logs for network device management and review them to identify abnormalities in configurations.
Implementation: Prevent network boundary devices from being physically accessed by unauthorized personnel to prevent tampering.
Related attack patterns
- Part of
- CAPEC-161 Infrastructure Manipulation
Examples
In November 2016, a Smart Install Exploitation Tool was released online which takes advantage of Cisco’s unau…
In November 2016, a Smart Install Exploitation Tool was released online which takes advantage of Cisco’s unauthenticated SMI management protocol to download a target’s current configuration files. Adversaries can use this tool to overwrite files to modify the device configurations, or upload maliciously modified OS or firmware to enable persistence. Once the adversary has access to the device’s configurations, they could modify it to redirect network traffic through other network infrastructure.
MITRE's words, unchanged: CAPEC-700 at MITRE. CAPEC is Copyright © 2007–2026, The MITRE Corporation, used under the CAPEC terms of use: “The MITRE Corporation (MITRE) hereby grants you a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC™) for research, development, and commercial purposes. Any copy you make for such purposes is authorized provided that you reproduce MITRE’s copyright designation and this license in any such copy.” CAPEC and the CAPEC logo are trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Credits. All attack patterns.