cve.bz

CVE-2026-99283 linux linux

no score yetEPSS 0.2%Fix available

linux linux: no CVSS score yet. EPSS 0.2% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days.

On this page
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: conntrack: tcp: use UNACK timeout for non-closing RST packets Commit be0502a3f2e9 ("netfilter: conntrack: tcp: only close if RST matches exact sequence") keeps an established conntrack entry in ESTABLISHED when an in-window RST does not match the expected sequence number exactly, so the endpoint can validate the RST with a challenge ACK. The timeout selection nevertheless uses the CLOSE timeout for every RST packet. The bug is that timeout selection is based on the packet type, not on the state transition result: even when RST validation keeps new_state in ESTABLISHED, the timeout is still forced to TCP_CONNTRACK_CLOSE. Linux TCP independently rate limits challenge ACKs per socket. A second non-exact RST can therefore arrive after the first challenge ACK has restored the timeout but before the rate limit expires. The second RST lowers the timeout to 10 seconds again while the endpoint suppresses the second challenge ACK, allowing the conntrack entry to expire while both TCP endpoints remain established. Using the ESTABLISHED timeout for such RSTs would avoid this short expiration window, but it could also retain stale entries for the five-day default because conntrack cannot reliably match the endpoint's exact TCP state. Use the UNACK timeout for RST packets that leave the conntrack entry in TCP_CONNTRACK_ESTABLISHED. Exact-match RSTs and accepted RST packet trains still fall through to timeouts[new_state], which preserves the CLOSE timeout when conntrack accepts the RST as closing the flow. This avoids the aggressive 10-second expiration window for non-exact RSTs while preserving the short timeout for RSTs that conntrack accepts as closing the flow.
EPSS
0.2% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 11th percentile. Scored 2026-11-13. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
Published
Modified
Assigned by
Linux (CNA)
NVD analysis
Awaiting analysis
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-99283 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-99283?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-99283?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-99283 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Badge for a README or a site

CVE-2026-99283

An image that stays current: it is drawn from the data each time it is fetched (a host that proxies images, as GitHub does, may show its copy for a while). Markdown:

[![CVE-2026-99283](https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-99283.svg)](https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-99283)

HTML:

<a href="https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-99283"><img src="https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-99283.svg" alt="CVE-2026-99283"></a>

Affected

Versions

From the CNA's record in the CVE List.

ProductAffected
Linuxbefore 6.12.117
Linuxbefore 6.18.61

Fixed in

ProductRelease lineFixed in
Linux6.126.12.117
Linux6.186.18.61
Linuxlater releases7.3

Fix and patched versions

Linux distributions

DistributionReleasePackageFixed inAdvisory
Debian12, 14linuxno fix listedDEBIAN-CVE-2026-99283
Debian13linux6.12.117-1DEBIAN-CVE-2026-99283
Ubuntu16.04:LTSlinux-hwe-edgeno fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-99283
Ubuntu18.04:LTSlinux-gcp, linux-hwe, linux-oem and 12 moreno fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-99283
Ubuntu20.04:LTSlinux-gke, linux-gkeop, linux-riscv and 26 moreno fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-99283
Ubuntu22.04:LTSlinux, linux-aws, linux-gcp and 57 moreno fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-99283
Ubuntu24.04:LTSlinux, linux-aws, linux-gcp and 50 moreno fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-99283
Ubuntu26.04:LTSlinux, linux-aws, linux-gcp and 12 moreno fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-99283
Ubuntu26.10linux, linux-aws, linux-gcp and 6 moreno fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-99283
UbuntuNvidia-BlueField:22.04:LTS, Nvidia-BlueField:24.04:LTSlinux-bluefieldno fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-99283
UbuntuPro:14.04:LTSlinux, linux-aws, linux-azure and 1 moreno fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-99283
UbuntuPro:16.04:LTSlinux, linux-aws, linux-gcp and 5 moreno fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-99283
UbuntuPro:18.04:LTSlinux, linux-aws, linux-kvm and 10 moreno fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-99283
UbuntuPro:20.04:LTSlinux, linux-aws, linux-gcp and 19 moreno fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-99283
4 more for Ubuntu in the JSON and on Ubuntu's page.
Azure Linux3kernelno fix listedAZL-112865
Alpaquita23, 25linux-ltsno fix listedBELL-CVE-2026-99283
Alpaquitastreamlinux-lts6.18.62-r0BELL-CVE-2026-99283

From the distributions' data via OSV.dev: the Debian Security Tracker; Ubuntu Security Notices © Canonical Ltd., CC BY-SA 4.0; Microsoft's Azure Linux vulnerability data, MIT; BellSoft's OSV database, MIT. Modified: reformatted and linked to CVE records. Credits. On the distributions' own pages: Debian · Ubuntu · Alpaquita.

Red Hat

Red Hat rates this Low.

Red Hat's statement

This vulnerability is rated as Low severity because successful exploitation requires an attacker to guess or observe active TCP connection parameters—including valid IP addresses, ports, and in-window sequence numbers—and carefully time packet bursts to bypass TCP challenge ACK rate limits. The blast radius is confined to premature session eviction for targeted flows within Netfilter state tables, leading to dropped traffic for only the affected connection rather than host instability or kernel crashes. Broader system operations and unaffected network communications continue without disruption, as new connections can be established normally.

Red Hat's mitigation

Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.

ProductPackageStateAdvisory
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10kernelFix deferred
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6kernelOut of support scope
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7kernelFix deferred
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7kernel-rtFix deferred
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8kernelFix deferred
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8kernel-rtFix deferred
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9kernelFix deferred
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9kernel-rtFix deferred
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-8Fix deferred
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9Fix deferred
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 5openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-10Fix deferred
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 5openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9Fix deferred

Contains Red Hat Security Data © Red Hat, Inc., licensed under CC BY 4.0. Source: https://access.redhat.com/security/data. Modified: reformatted. Red Hat's page for CVE-2026-99283.

References

Check your stackJSON