cve.bz

CVE-2026-84229

6.5 mediumEPSS 0.2%

Medium (6.5) in ibm guardium data protection. EPSS 0.2% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days.

On this page
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.4 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper validation of CSRF tokens for GET requests.

Severity

CVSS 3.1

6.5 medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
EPSS
0.2% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 16th percentile. Scored 2026-11-10. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
CISA's assessment (SSVC)
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial, assessed 2026-11-09. From CISA's Vulnrichment in the CVE List: whether it is exploited, whether exploiting it can be automated, and how much control it gives.
CWE
CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (Cross Site Reference Forgery)
OWASP Top 10
A01:2025 Broken Access Control
Published
Modified
Assigned by
ibm (CNA)
NVD analysis
Analyzed
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

ChatGPTClaudeGoogle AI Mode

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-84229 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-84229?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-84229?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-84229 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Affected

Versions

From the NVD's CPE matches.

ProductAffected
ibm:guardium_data_protection12.2.4

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

  • CAPEC-62 Cross Site Request Forgery Likelihood: High · Severity: Very High
  • CAPEC-111 JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking) Likelihood: High · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-462 Cross-Domain Search Timing Severity: Medium
  • CAPEC-467 Cross Site Identification Severity: Low

The attack patterns MITRE's CAPEC relates to this record's weaknesses, as MITRE names them. Credits.

History

  1. Analyzed by the NVD

Changes since this site first stored the record. The same for every record: /api/public/changes.

References

Check your stackJSON