cve.bz

CVE-2026-83493

9.1 criticalEPSS 0.3%

Critical (9.1). EPSS 0.3% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days.

On this page
A flaw was found in distributed-workloads. A remote attacker could exploit a vulnerability in the pull_request_target workflow by submitting a specially crafted pull request. This workflow processes untrusted code from the pull request author while operating with the base repository's sensitive secrets, such as the SNYK_TOKEN, and its default write token. Consequently, an attacker could exfiltrate these secrets, leading to unauthorized access to the Snyk integration and potential control over the repository.

Severity

CVSS 3.1

9.1 critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
EPSS
0.3% (unchanged from 0.2% a week ago) estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 25th percentile. Scored 2026-11-13. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
CISA's assessment (SSVC)
Exploitation: none · Automatable: yes · Technical impact: total, assessed 2026-11-06. From CISA's Vulnrichment in the CVE List: whether it is exploited, whether exploiting it can be automated, and how much control it gives.
CWE
CWE-829 Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere
OWASP Top 10
A08:2025 Software or Data Integrity Failures
Published
Modified
NVD analysis
Awaiting analysis
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-83493 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-83493?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-83493?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-83493 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Badge for a README or a site

CVE-2026-83493

An image that stays current: it is drawn from the data each time it is fetched (a host that proxies images, as GitHub does, may show its copy for a while). Markdown:

[![CVE-2026-83493](https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-83493.svg)](https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-83493)

HTML:

<a href="https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-83493"><img src="https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-83493.svg" alt="CVE-2026-83493"></a>

Red Hat

Red Hat rates this Moderate.

Red Hat's statement

The vulnerability in a pull_request_target workflow within the red-hat-data-services/distributed-workloads repository allowed an attacker to exfiltrate the SNYK_TOKEN secret by submitting a malicious pull request. This Moderate impact flaw could have led to unauthorized access to the Snyk integration and potentially the repository's write token. This issue has been remediated by deleting the vulnerable workflow and removing the SNYK_TOKEN.

Red Hat's mitigation

Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.

ProductPackageStateAdvisory
Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)rhoai/odh-training-cuda128-torch29-py312-rhel9Under investigation

Contains Red Hat Security Data © Red Hat, Inc., licensed under CC BY 4.0. Source: https://access.redhat.com/security/data. Modified: reformatted. Red Hat's page for CVE-2026-83493.

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

The attack patterns MITRE's CAPEC relates to this record's weaknesses, as MITRE names them. Credits. More on the page of CWE-829 (13).

References

Check your stackJSON