cve.bz

CVE-2026-76080 Probo: Unauthenticated cross-tenant and hidden-item disclosure via Query.node in the public Trust Center API

3.7 lowEPSS 0.3%

Low (3.7) in getprobo probo. EPSS 0.3% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days.

On this page
Probo is a self-hostable governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) platform built for engineering and security teams. Prior to version 0.224.0, the public Trust Center GraphQL API exposes Query.node(id:) with @authentication(required: OPTIONAL) — an unauthenticated internet visitor to any published trust center can call it. Six of its type branches — Organization, Framework, Audit, ThirdParty (subprocessor), TrustCenter, and TrustCenterReference — resolve the object with a tenant scope derived from the client-supplied GID itself (coredata.NewScopeFromObjectID(id)) and load it with a bare Get(scope, id) that performs no comparison to the current trust center's OrganizationID and no showOnTrustCenter/visibility check. (The Document and File branches, by contrast, correctly pass trustCenter.OrganizationID and check visibility). This issue has been patched in version 0.224.0.

Severity

CVSS 3.1

3.7 low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
EPSS
0.3% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 26th percentile. Scored 2026-11-13. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
CWEs
CWE-284 Improper Access Control
CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
OWASP Top 10
A01:2025 Broken Access Control
Published
Modified
Assigned by
GitHub_M (CNA)
NVD analysis
Deferred: the NVD does not plan to analyze it
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-76080 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-76080?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-76080?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-76080 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Badge for a README or a site

CVE-2026-76080

An image that stays current: it is drawn from the data each time it is fetched (a host that proxies images, as GitHub does, may show its copy for a while). Markdown:

[![CVE-2026-76080](https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-76080.svg)](https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-76080)

HTML:

<a href="https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-76080"><img src="https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-76080.svg" alt="CVE-2026-76080"></a>

Affected

Versions

From the CNA's record in the CVE List.

ProductAffected
getprobo probo< 0.224.0

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

The attack patterns MITRE's CAPEC relates to this record's weaknesses, as MITRE names them. Credits. More on the page of CWE-284 (17).

History

  1. The NVD deferred its analysis

Changes since this site first stored the record. The same for every record: /api/public/changes.

References

Check your stackJSON