cve.bz

CVE-2026-64668 pam_usb: deny_remote bypassed by zone-indexed IPv6 addresses (fe80::1%eth0) in pusb_tmux_has_remote_clients

7.4 highEPSS 0.4%

High (7.4) in mcdope pam usb. EPSS 0.4% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days.

On this page
pam_usb provides hardware authentication for Linux using removable media. From version 0.8.0 to before version 0.9.3, the deny_remote feature in pam_usb uses /usr/bin/w -i to detect whether the authenticating user has an active remote tmux session. In pusb_tmux_has_remote_clients() (src/tmux.c), the IPv6 detection pattern matched the address group and then immediately expected whitespace. On Linux systems with multi-homed network interfaces, w -i appends a zone index (scope identifier) to link-local IPv6 addresses — e.g. fe80::1%eth0. The %eth0 suffix appeared between the address and the next whitespace field, causing the regex match to fail even for an otherwise-matching remote session. The function returned "no remote clients" and granted access. This issue has been patched in version 0.9.3.

Severity

CVSS 3.1

7.4 high
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
EPSS
0.4% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 33rd percentile. Scored 2026-11-13. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
CISA's assessment (SSVC)
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total, assessed 2026-11-12. From CISA's Vulnrichment in the CVE List: whether it is exploited, whether exploiting it can be automated, and how much control it gives.
CWEs
CWE-285 Improper Authorization
CWE-693 Protection Mechanism Failure
OWASP Top 10
A01:2025 Broken Access Control, A06:2025 Insecure Design
Published
Modified
Assigned by
GitHub_M (CNA)
NVD analysis
Deferred: the NVD does not plan to analyze it
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-64668 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-64668?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-64668?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-64668 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Badge for a README or a site

CVE-2026-64668

An image that stays current: it is drawn from the data each time it is fetched (a host that proxies images, as GitHub does, may show its copy for a while). Markdown:

[![CVE-2026-64668](https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-64668.svg)](https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-64668)

HTML:

<a href="https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-64668"><img src="https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-64668.svg" alt="CVE-2026-64668"></a>

Affected

Versions

From the CNA's record in the CVE List.

ProductAffected
mcdope pam_usb>= 0.8.0, < 0.9.3

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

The attack patterns MITRE's CAPEC relates to this record's weaknesses, as MITRE names them. Credits. More on the page of CWE-285 (16), CWE-693 (17).

History

  1. The NVD deferred its analysis

Changes since this site first stored the record. The same for every record: /api/public/changes.

References

Check your stackJSON