CVSS 3.1
8.1 highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:HCVE-2026-63660 node-fontnik: integer-overflow heap out-of-bounds write in RenderSDF
High (8.1) in mapbox node-fontnik. EPSS 0.4% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days.
On this page
node-fontnik is a library that delivers a range of glyphs rendered as SDFs (signed distance fields) in a protocol buffer. Prior to version 0.7.7, a crafted font could trigger a heap out-of-bounds write in RenderSDF (include/mapbox/glyph_foundry_impl.hpp). RenderSDF computed the SDF bitmap allocation size as buffered_width * buffered_height in 32-bit unsigned int. Glyph dimensions are derived from the uploaded font's outline bounding box with no upper bound, so a glyph large enough to make that product exceed 2³² wrapped to a small value. The buffer was then under-allocated while the render loop still wrote one byte per pixel, corrupting the heap (CWE-190 → CWE-787) and crashing the process. A 680-byte font is enough to drive FreeType to a 65536×65536 buffered glyph, wrapping the size to 0. This issue has been patched in version 0.7.7.
Severity
- EPSS
- 0.4% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 36th percentile. Scored 2026-11-13. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
- CISA's assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total, assessed 2026-11-13. From CISA's Vulnrichment in the CVE List: whether it is exploited, whether exploiting it can be automated, and how much control it gives.
- CWEs
- CWE-190 Integer Overflow or Wraparound (Year 2038 problem, Y2K38, Y2038, Epochalypse)
CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write - Published
- Modified
- Assigned by
- GitHub_M (CNA)
- NVD analysis
- Deferred: the NVD does not plan to analyze it
- Record from
- the NVD, synced
Ask an AI about this CVE
Show the prompt
Explain CVE-2026-63660 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-63660?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-63660?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-63660 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.
Badge for a README or a site
An image that stays current: it is drawn from the data each time it is fetched (a host that proxies images, as GitHub does, may show its copy for a while). Markdown:
[](https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-63660)
HTML:
<a href="https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-63660"><img src="https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-63660.svg" alt="CVE-2026-63660"></a>
Affected
Versions
From the CNA's record in the CVE List.
| Product | Affected |
|---|---|
| mapbox node-fontnik | < 0.7.7 |
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- CAPEC-92 Forced Integer Overflow Likelihood: High · Severity: High
The attack patterns MITRE's CAPEC relates to this record's weaknesses, as MITRE names them. Credits.
History
- The NVD deferred its analysis
Changes since this site first stored the record. The same for every record: /api/public/changes.