cve.bz

CVE-2026-63011 intermesh groupoffice: Code Injection

9.4 criticalEPSS 0.3%

Critical (9.4) in intermesh groupoffice. EPSS 0.3% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days.

On this page
Group-Office is an enterprise customer relationship management and groupware tool. Prior to versions 6.8.167, 25.0.102, and 26.0.27, the Contact/labels JMAP endpoint in GroupOffice accepts a fully attacker-controlled template string (tpl parameter) that is passed without restriction to TemplateParser::parse(). When the template contains an [assign] block whose expression includes a {{...}} variable reference, the engine calls eval() on the expanded expression after running it through a validateExpression() guard. The guard double-quotes unrecognized tokens, but PHP 7+ allows a string enclosed in parentheses to be invoked as a function ("system")("id") is valid PHP and calls system("id"). A single authenticated HTTP request is sufficient to execute arbitrary OS commands as the web server user (www-data). This issue has been patched in versions 6.8.167, 25.0.102, and 26.0.27.

Severity

CVSS 4.0

9.4 critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
EPSS
0.3% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 29th percentile. Scored 2026-11-13. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
CISA's assessment (SSVC)
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total, assessed 2026-11-10. From CISA's Vulnrichment in the CVE List: whether it is exploited, whether exploiting it can be automated, and how much control it gives.
CWEs
CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code (Code Injection)
CWE-95 Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code (Eval Injection)
CWE-184 Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs
OWASP Top 10
A05:2025 Injection
Published
Modified
Assigned by
GitHub_M (CNA)
NVD analysis
Deferred: the NVD does not plan to analyze it
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-63011 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-63011?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-63011?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-63011 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Badge for a README or a site

CVE-2026-63011

An image that stays current: it is drawn from the data each time it is fetched (a host that proxies images, as GitHub does, may show its copy for a while). Markdown:

[![CVE-2026-63011](https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-63011.svg)](https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-63011)

HTML:

<a href="https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-63011"><img src="https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-63011.svg" alt="CVE-2026-63011"></a>

Affected

Versions

From the CNA's record in the CVE List.

ProductAffected
Intermesh groupoffice< 6.8.167
Intermesh groupoffice< 25.0.102
Intermesh groupoffice< 26.0.27

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

  • CAPEC-35 Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executable Files Likelihood: High · Severity: Very High
  • CAPEC-77 Manipulating User-Controlled Variables Likelihood: High · Severity: Very High
  • CAPEC-242 Code Injection Likelihood: High · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-3 Using Leading 'Ghost' Character Sequences to Bypass Input Filters Likelihood: Medium · Severity: Medium
  • CAPEC-6 Argument Injection Likelihood: High · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-15 Command Delimiters Likelihood: High · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-43 Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers Likelihood: Medium · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-71 Using Unicode Encoding to Bypass Validation Logic Likelihood: Medium · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-73 User-Controlled Filename Likelihood: High · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-85 AJAX Footprinting Likelihood: High · Severity: Low

The attack patterns MITRE's CAPEC relates to this record's weaknesses, as MITRE names them. Credits. More on the page of CWE-184.

History

  1. The NVD deferred its analysis

Changes since this site first stored the record. The same for every record: /api/public/changes.

References

Check your stackJSON