cve.bz

CVE-2026-49990 BACnet Stack: AtomicReadFile/AtomicWriteFile stream fileStartPosition validation flaw causes out-of-bounds read/write in RAM file backends

8.6 high

High (8.6) in bacnet-stack bacnet-stack.

On this page
BACnet Stack is a BACnet open source protocol stack C library for embedded systems. From versions 1.4.2 to before 1.4.5, and 1.5.0 to before 1.5.1, a signed fileStartPosition taken from AtomicReadFile and AtomicWriteFile stream-access requests is not validated tightly enough before it reaches the RAM file backends. Practical impact includes: reliable denial of service via process crash, out-of-bounds read that may expose adjacent memory contents, or out-of-bounds write that may corrupt heap memory and destabilize the process. This issue has been patched in versions 1.4.5 and 1.5.1.

Severity

CVSS 3.1

8.6 high
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
CISA's assessment (SSVC)
Exploitation: PoC · Automatable: yes · Technical impact: partial, assessed 2026-11-13. From CISA's Vulnrichment in the CVE List: whether it is exploited, whether exploiting it can be automated, and how much control it gives.
CWEs
CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read
CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write
Published
Modified
Assigned by
GitHub_M (CNA)
NVD analysis
Awaiting analysis
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-49990 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-49990?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-49990?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-49990 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Badge for a README or a site

CVE-2026-49990

An image that stays current: it is drawn from the data each time it is fetched (a host that proxies images, as GitHub does, may show its copy for a while). Markdown:

[![CVE-2026-49990](https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-49990.svg)](https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-49990)

HTML:

<a href="https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-49990"><img src="https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-49990.svg" alt="CVE-2026-49990"></a>

Affected

Versions

From the CNA's record in the CVE List.

ProductAffected
bacnet-stack>= 1.4.2, < 1.4.5
bacnet-stack>= 1.5.0, < 1.5.1

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

  • CAPEC-540 Overread Buffers Likelihood: Low · Severity: High

The attack patterns MITRE's CAPEC relates to this record's weaknesses, as MITRE names them. Credits.

References

Check your stackJSON