cve.bz

CVE-2026-129165 Tactical RMM 0.17.0 through 1.6.1 Arbitrary File Read via Report Preview

9.4 critical

Critical (9.4) in amidaware tactical rmm.

On this page
Tactical RMM 0.17.0 through 1.6.1 contains an arbitrary file read in the /reporting/templates/preview/ endpoint because WeasyPrint resolves file:// links in user-supplied template_md and embeds the files in the returned PDF. Users with report management permission can read the Django SECRET_KEY, reused as the NATS password, and publish runscript commands to every managed agent.

Severity

CVSS 4.0

9.4 critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

CVSS 3.1

9.1 critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CISA's assessment (SSVC)
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total, assessed 2026-11-13. From CISA's Vulnrichment in the CVE List: whether it is exploited, whether exploiting it can be automated, and how much control it gives.
CWE
CWE-73 External Control of File Name or Path
OWASP Top 10
A06:2025 Insecure Design
Published
Modified
Assigned by
VulnCheck (CNA)
NVD analysis
Awaiting analysis
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

ChatGPTClaudeGoogle AI Mode

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-129165 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-129165?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-129165?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-129165 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Badge for a README or a site

CVE-2026-129165

An image that stays current: it is drawn from the data each time it is fetched (a host that proxies images, as GitHub does, may show its copy for a while). Markdown:

[![CVE-2026-129165](https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-129165.svg)](https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-129165)

HTML:

<a href="https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-129165"><img src="https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-129165.svg" alt="CVE-2026-129165"></a>

Affected

  • amidaware:tactical rmm

Versions

From the CNA's record in the CVE List.

ProductAffected
AmidaWare Tactical RMMfrom 0.17.0 through 1.6.1

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

  • CAPEC-13 Subverting Environment Variable Values Likelihood: High · Severity: Very High
  • CAPEC-64 Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation Logic Likelihood: High · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-72 URL Encoding Likelihood: High · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-76 Manipulating Web Input to File System Calls Likelihood: High · Severity: Very High
  • CAPEC-78 Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate Encoding Likelihood: High · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-79 Using Slashes in Alternate Encoding Likelihood: High · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-80 Using UTF-8 Encoding to Bypass Validation Logic Likelihood: High · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-267 Leverage Alternate Encoding Likelihood: High · Severity: High

The attack patterns MITRE's CAPEC relates to this record's weaknesses, as MITRE names them. Credits.

References

Check your stackJSON