cve.bz

CVE-2026-126619 Misinterpretation of Input in hMailServer

4.8 mediumEPSS 0.3%

Medium (4.8) in progressive robot ltd hmailserver. EPSS 0.3% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days.

On this page
Misinterpretation of SQL statement text in the database layer of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0-B1 through 6.3.7 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to have a failed database write reported to the server as successful. The layer answers a failed statement as a success when it finds the marker [IGNORE-ERRORS], which is meant only for the server's own schema statements (its upgrade scripts and the database log's tables), and statements carry values from outside - an envelope address, the user name of a failed logon, a message's headers - in their text on MySQL/MariaDB and PostgreSQL, and in the batches of the database log on every engine. Up to 6.2.18 the marker was honoured anywhere in a statement, a value included, on MySQL/MariaDB and PostgreSQL. From 6.2.19 it was honoured only inside a comment, but the layer read a backslash inside a string literal as an escape, which SQL Server, SQL Server Compact and PostgreSQL with standard_conforming_strings on (its default) do not, so that on those engines a value holding a backslash could make the layer take part of the statement's literals for statement text and find the marker there: on PostgreSQL from 6.3.3 for every statement carrying an outside value that holds a backslash, with no setting changed for a message delivered into a local mailbox (through an internationalised (SMTPUTF8) envelope sender) and for the IP range an auto-ban writes (named after the user name of the failed logon), and on SQL Server and SQL Server Compact for the database log, when the server logs to the database (logging is off, and the log device is files, by default). A statement run outside a transaction that then failed - a constraint, a deadlock, a lock or statement timeout, a full disk, and up to 6.2.18 a lost connection - was answered as a success, and its caller went on as if the row had been written: a message delivered into a local mailbox could be counted as delivered with no row to show it and no failure notice to its sender, and a message accepted with 250 could be left with no queue row and never delivered (up to 6.2.18, and on PostgreSQL from 6.3.3 when every recipient's address carries the marker too, which needs an address that takes any local part); an auto-ban whose IP range was not written could be logged and counted as applied, with no error reported, while the address stayed unbanned; and message metadata (written only when message indexing is on), entries of the database log and rows of features an administrator turns on could be lost without an error. On MySQL/MariaDB up to 6.2.18 the caller was handed whatever identifier the client library still held for the connection - 0, or that of an insert its last successful statement made, in whatever table - under which a queued message's recipients were then written, so that another message still in the queue could be delivered to them as well. This flaw gives a value no way to change what a statement does, and no privilege is gained.

Severity

CVSS 3.1

4.8 medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
EPSS
0.3% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 17th percentile. Scored 2026-11-13. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
CWE
CWE-115 Misinterpretation of Input
OWASP Top 10
A05:2025 Injection
Published
Modified
Assigned by
GitLab (CNA)
NVD analysis
Deferred: the NVD does not plan to analyze it
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-126619 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-126619?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-126619?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-126619 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Badge for a README or a site

CVE-2026-126619

An image that stays current: it is drawn from the data each time it is fetched (a host that proxies images, as GitHub does, may show its copy for a while). Markdown:

[![CVE-2026-126619](https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-126619.svg)](https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-126619)

HTML:

<a href="https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-126619"><img src="https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-126619.svg" alt="CVE-2026-126619"></a>

Affected

  • progressive robot ltd:hmailserver

Versions

From the CNA's record in the CVE List.

ProductAffected
Progressive Robot Ltd hMailServerfrom 6.0.0-B1 through 6.3.7

History

  1. The NVD deferred its analysis

Changes since this site first stored the record. The same for every record: /api/public/changes.

References

Check your stackJSON