cve.bz

CVE-2026-126070 Action View: Possible XSS vulnerability in Action View strip_tags

6.1 mediumEPSS 0.3%Fix available

Medium (6.1) in rails rails. EPSS 0.3% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days. Fixed in actionview 8.0.5.2, 8.1.4.1.

On this page
Action View is a framework for handling view template lookup and rendering and provides view helpers for building HTML. Prior to 8.1.4.1 and 8.0.5.2, strip_tags in Action View returns its sanitized output marked html_safe, but the underlying sanitizer encodes only &, < and >, leaving " and ' unencoded. Because ERB does not escape a string marked html_safe, untrusted input passed through strip_tags and rendered inside a quoted HTML attribute value could close the attribute and add new attributes, possibly leading to XSS. Applications that render strip_tags output from untrusted input inside an HTML attribute, for example in a title attribute or a <meta content> tag, are affected. Output rendered as element content is not affected. This issue is fixed in versions 8.1.4.1 and 8.0.5.2.

Severity

CVSS 3.1

6.1 medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
EPSS
0.3% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 19th percentile. Scored 2026-11-13. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
CISA's assessment (SSVC)
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial, assessed 2026-11-12. From CISA's Vulnrichment in the CVE List: whether it is exploited, whether exploiting it can be automated, and how much control it gives.
CWE
CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (Cross-site Scripting)
OWASP Top 10
A05:2025 Injection
Published
Modified
Assigned by
GitHub_M (CNA)
NVD analysis
Awaiting analysis
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-126070 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-126070?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-126070?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-126070 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Badge for a README or a site

CVE-2026-126070

An image that stays current: it is drawn from the data each time it is fetched (a host that proxies images, as GitHub does, may show its copy for a while). Markdown:

[![CVE-2026-126070](https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-126070.svg)](https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-126070)

HTML:

<a href="https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-126070"><img src="https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-126070.svg" alt="CVE-2026-126070"></a>

Affected

Versions

From the CNA's record in the CVE List.

ProductAffected
rails< 8.0.5.2
rails>= 8.1, < 8.1.4.1

Fix and patched versions

  • actionview (RubyGems): fixed in 8.1.4.1, 8.0.5.2

Packages (OSV)

AdvisoryEcosystemPackageAffectedFixed in
GHSA-rq8q-p985-fjq7RubyGemsactionview>=8.1.0.beta1 <8.1.4.18.1.4.1
GHSA-rq8q-p985-fjq7RubyGemsactionview<8.0.5.28.0.5.2

Linux distributions

DistributionReleasePackageFixed inAdvisory
Debian12, 13, 14railsno fix listedDEBIAN-CVE-2026-126070
Ubuntu24.04:LTS, 26.04:LTS, 26.10 and 4 morerailsno fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-126070

From the distributions' data via OSV.dev: the Debian Security Tracker; Ubuntu Security Notices © Canonical Ltd., CC BY-SA 4.0. Modified: reformatted and linked to CVE records. Credits. On the distributions' own pages: Debian · Ubuntu.

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

  • CAPEC-63 Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Likelihood: High · Severity: Very High
  • CAPEC-85 AJAX Footprinting Likelihood: High · Severity: Low
  • CAPEC-209 XSS Using MIME Type Mismatch Severity: Medium
  • CAPEC-588 DOM-Based XSS Likelihood: High · Severity: Very High
  • CAPEC-591 Reflected XSS Likelihood: High · Severity: Very High
  • CAPEC-592 Stored XSS Likelihood: High · Severity: Very High

The attack patterns MITRE's CAPEC relates to this record's weaknesses, as MITRE names them. Credits.

References

Check your stackJSON