cve.bz

CVE-2026-125399 fluxionnetwork fluxion: OS Command Injection

8.6 highEPSS 1.3%

High (8.6) in fluxionnetwork fluxion. EPSS 1.3% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days.

On this page
Fluxion before 6.39 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in the fluxion.sh target scanner, which decodes access point ESSIDs with eval after escaping only single quotes. Attackers within Wi-Fi range can broadcast an access point with a crafted SSID to execute commands as root when the operator scans or selects it.

Severity

CVSS 4.0

8.6 high
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

CVSS 3.1

8.0 high
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS
1.3% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 71st percentile. Scored 2026-11-13. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
CISA's assessment (SSVC)
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total, assessed 2026-11-10. From CISA's Vulnrichment in the CVE List: whether it is exploited, whether exploiting it can be automated, and how much control it gives.
CWE
CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (OS Command Injection)
OWASP Top 10
A05:2025 Injection
Published
Modified
Assigned by
VulnCheck (CNA)
NVD analysis
Deferred: the NVD does not plan to analyze it
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

ChatGPTClaudeGoogle AI Mode

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-125399 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-125399?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-125399?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-125399 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Badge for a README or a site

CVE-2026-125399

An image that stays current: it is drawn from the data each time it is fetched (a host that proxies images, as GitHub does, may show its copy for a while). Markdown:

[![CVE-2026-125399](https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-125399.svg)](https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-125399)

HTML:

<a href="https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-125399"><img src="https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-125399.svg" alt="CVE-2026-125399"></a>

Affected

Versions

From the CNA's record in the CVE List.

ProductAffected
FluxionNetwork fluxionbefore 6.39

GitHub PoC (unverified)

Repositories on GitHub named after this CVE. Nobody has checked them and they are not scanned: some hold a working proof of concept, some nothing useful, and some malware made to look like one. Read the code before you run any of it.

  • VulnSVNC/CVE-2026-125399 1 star, Shell, created
    Zero-Click, Unauthenticated OS Command Injection via eval() on Attacker-Controlled ESSID in Fluxion

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

  • CAPEC-6 Argument Injection Likelihood: High · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-15 Command Delimiters Likelihood: High · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-43 Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers Likelihood: Medium · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-88 OS Command Injection Likelihood: High · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-108 Command Line Execution through SQL Injection Likelihood: Low · Severity: Very High

The attack patterns MITRE's CAPEC relates to this record's weaknesses, as MITRE names them. Credits.

History

  1. The NVD deferred its analysis

Changes since this site first stored the record. The same for every record: /api/public/changes.

References

Check your stackJSON