cve.bz

CVE-2026-124739 Busybox: httpd stack buffer overflow via an "i:" rule in a subdirectory httpd.conf

7.5 highEPSS 0.5%

High (7.5) in red hat. EPSS 0.5% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days.

On this page
A flaw was found in BusyBox. When the httpd web server processes subdirectory configuration files, an overly long index page name can trigger a stack-based buffer overflow. An attacker with permissions to write to a subdirectory configuration file could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges or cause a denial of service (DoS) by crashing the server process.

Severity

CVSS 3.1

7.5 high
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS
0.5% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 41st percentile. Scored 2026-11-13. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
CISA's assessment (SSVC)
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total, assessed 2026-11-13. From CISA's Vulnrichment in the CVE List: whether it is exploited, whether exploiting it can be automated, and how much control it gives.
CWE
CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write
Published
Modified
Assigned by
redhat (CNA)
NVD analysis
Awaiting analysis
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-124739 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-124739?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-124739?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-124739 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Badge for a README or a site

CVE-2026-124739

An image that stays current: it is drawn from the data each time it is fetched (a host that proxies images, as GitHub does, may show its copy for a while). Markdown:

[![CVE-2026-124739](https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-124739.svg)](https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-124739)

HTML:

<a href="https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-124739"><img src="https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-124739.svg" alt="CVE-2026-124739"></a>

Affected

  • red hat:red hat enterprise linux 6
  • red hat:red hat hardened images

Linux distributions

DistributionReleasePackageFixed inAdvisory
Ubuntu20.04:LTS, 22.04:LTS, 24.04:LTS and 5 morebusyboxno fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-124739

From the distributions' data via OSV.dev: Ubuntu Security Notices © Canonical Ltd., CC BY-SA 4.0. Modified: reformatted and linked to CVE records. Credits. On the distributions' own pages: Ubuntu.

Red Hat

Red Hat rates this Important.

Red Hat's statement

This vulnerability is rated as Important because successful exploitation allows a local user with write access to web-accessible directories to execute arbitrary code with elevated root privileges or trigger a denial of service. Within Red Hat environments, BusyBox is not deployed as a standard web server by default, significantly limiting exposure in standard installations. Exploitation specifically requires the BusyBox httpd service to be actively running and serving content from directories where untrusted users possess write permissions to introduce or modify local configuration files.

Red Hat's mitigation

Prevent untrusted users from creating or modifying configuration files by restricting write permissions on all web root and subdirectory paths served by BusyBox httpd to administrative accounts only:

chmod -R o-w /path/to/webroot

Additionally, ensure the BusyBox httpd process drops elevated privileges by specifying an unprivileged user with the `-u` flag upon execution:

busybox httpd -u nobody

Restarting the daemon is required for process-level flag changes to take effect, which will temporarily terminate active network connections.

Caveats: Running under a non-privileged user account prevents binding directly to privileged ports (below 1024) without additional system capabilities or port forwarding, and restricting directory permissions may interfere with workflows that require unprivileged file uploads.

ProductPackageStateAdvisory
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6busyboxAffected
Red Hat Hardened ImagesbusyboxAffected

Contains Red Hat Security Data © Red Hat, Inc., licensed under CC BY 4.0. Source: https://access.redhat.com/security/data. Modified: reformatted. Red Hat's page for CVE-2026-124739.

References

Check your stackJSON