cve.bz

CVE-2026-123877 Node.js is vulnerable to a certificate validation bypass in https.Agent via cross-policy TLS session reuse

6.8 mediumEPSS 0.2%

Medium (6.8) in nodejs node. EPSS 0.2% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days.

On this page
A certificate validation bypass in Node.js https.Agent lets a cached TLS session authenticated under one CA policy be reused by a later request with a stricter policy. https.Agent.prototype.getName() assigns the same Agent and session-cache key to a request that omits ca and one that explicitly supplies ca: [], because an omitted value appends nothing to the key while an empty array stringifies to an empty string. The two policies differ: omitting ca uses the default trust store, while supplying ca replaces it. Since they share a key, a TLS session authenticated under the broader default policy is handed to a new connection made under the later ca: [] policy, and TLS 1.3 session resumption carries the earlier authentication forward, so the second request reports authorized === true and transmits confidential data to a server its own CA policy would reject on a fresh connection. This vulnerability affects Node.js 26.x, 24.x, and 22.x.

Severity

CVSS 3.0

6.8 medium
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
EPSS
0.2% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 12th percentile. Scored 2026-11-13. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
CWE
CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation
OWASP Top 10
A07:2025 Authentication Failures
Published
Modified
Assigned by
openjs (CNA)
NVD analysis
Awaiting analysis
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-123877 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-123877?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-123877?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-123877 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Badge for a README or a site

CVE-2026-123877

An image that stays current: it is drawn from the data each time it is fetched (a host that proxies images, as GitHub does, may show its copy for a while). Markdown:

[![CVE-2026-123877](https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-123877.svg)](https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-123877)

HTML:

<a href="https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-123877"><img src="https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-123877.svg" alt="CVE-2026-123877"></a>

Affected

Versions

From the CNA's record in the CVE List.

ProductAffected
nodejs nodefrom 0.0.0 before 22.23.5
nodejs nodefrom 23.0.0 before 24.22.3
nodejs nodefrom 25.0.0 before 26.13.1

Fix and patched versions

Linux distributions

DistributionReleasePackageFixed inAdvisory
Debian12, 13, 14nodejsno fix listedDEBIAN-CVE-2026-123877
Ubuntu24.04:LTS, 26.04:LTS, 26.10 and 5 morenodejsno fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-123877
Red Hathummingbird:1nodejs22, nodejs22-bin, nodejs22-docs and 4 more1:22.23.5-2.3.2.3.1.hum1RHSA-2026:99433
Red Hathummingbird:1nodejs22-npm1:10.9.9-1.22.23.5.2.3.2.3.1.hum1RHSA-2026:99433
Red Hathummingbird:1nodejs24, nodejs24-bin, nodejs24-docs and 3 more1:24.22.3-0.1.hum1RHSA-2026:99435
Red Hathummingbird:1nodejs24-npm2:11.19.1-1.24.22.3.0.1.hum1RHSA-2026:99435
Red Hathummingbird:1nodejs24-npm-bin2:24.22.3-0.1.hum1RHSA-2026:99435
Red Hathummingbird:1nodejs26, nodejs26-bin, nodejs26-docs and 4 more1:26.13.1-0.1.hum1RHSA-2026:99436
Red Hathummingbird:1nodejs26-npm1:11.20.0-1.26.13.1.0.1.hum1RHSA-2026:99436
Alpinev3.21, v3.22nodejs22.23.5-r0ALPINE-CVE-2026-123877
Alpinev3.23, v3.24nodejs24.22.3-r0ALPINE-CVE-2026-123877
Alpinev3.24nodejs-current26.13.1-r0ALPINE-CVE-2026-123877
Alpaquitastreamnodejs2222.23.5-r0BELL-CVE-2026-123877
Alpaquitastreamnodejs2424.22.3-r0BELL-CVE-2026-123877
Alpaquitastreamnodejs2626.13.1-r0BELL-CVE-2026-123877
BellSoft Hardened Containersstreamnodejs2222.23.5-r0BELL-CVE-2026-123877
BellSoft Hardened Containersstreamnodejs2424.22.3-r0BELL-CVE-2026-123877
BellSoft Hardened Containersstreamnodejs2626.13.1-r0BELL-CVE-2026-123877

From the distributions' data via OSV.dev: the Debian Security Tracker; Ubuntu Security Notices © Canonical Ltd., CC BY-SA 4.0; Red Hat Security Data © Red Hat, Inc., CC BY 4.0; the Alpine secdb, CC BY-SA 4.0; BellSoft's OSV database, MIT. Modified: reformatted and linked to CVE records. Credits. On the distributions' own pages: Debian · Ubuntu · Red Hat · Alpine · Alpaquita · BellSoft Hardened Containers.

Red Hat

Red Hat rates this Moderate.

Red Hat's statement

This vulnerability is rated as Moderate severity because exploitation depends on specific application patterns that share an HTTPS agent between requests using standard system trust stores and requests requiring custom certificate authority constraints. In typical Red Hat enterprise environments, applications usually maintain uniform TLS configurations or employ separate agent instances for sensitive outbound connections with distinct validation requirements. Because successful exploitation necessitates this uncommon agent-sharing pattern alongside precise connection sequencing and network positioning, the overall risk to most deployments remains contained.

Red Hat's mitigation

Do not reuse a single https.Agent across requests that use different ca trust policies. Create separate Agents per CA policy, or disable TLS session reuse between divergent policies.

ProductPackageStateAdvisory
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10nodejs22Fix deferred
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10nodejs24Fix deferred
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10nodejs26Fix deferred
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8nodejs:22/nodejsFix deferred
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8nodejs:24/nodejsFix deferred
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9nodejs:22/nodejsFix deferred
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9nodejs:24/nodejsFix deferred
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9nodejs:26/nodejsFix deferred
Red Hat Hardened Imageshi/nodejsUnder investigation
Red Hat Hardened Imagesnodejs20Will not fix
Red Hat Hardened Imagesnodejs22Affected
Red Hat Hardened Imagesnodejs24Affected
Red Hat Hardened Imagesnodejs25Will not fix
Red Hat Hardened Imagesnodejs26Affected
Red Hat Hardened Imagesnpm12Under investigation

Contains Red Hat Security Data © Red Hat, Inc., licensed under CC BY 4.0. Source: https://access.redhat.com/security/data. Modified: reformatted. Red Hat's page for CVE-2026-123877.

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

  • CAPEC-459 Creating a Rogue Certification Authority Certificate Likelihood: Medium · Severity: Very High
  • CAPEC-475 Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation Likelihood: Low · Severity: High

The attack patterns MITRE's CAPEC relates to this record's weaknesses, as MITRE names them. Credits.

References

Check your stackJSON