cve.bz

CVE-2026-123128

3.7 lowEPSS 0.1%

Low (3.7). EPSS 0.1% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days.

On this page
The GemBooking WordPress plugin before 1.7.1 does not serialise concurrent booking requests per team member, allowing unauthenticated users to create overlapping confirmed bookings for the same team member across different bookable items by sending simultaneous requests.

Severity

CVSS 3.1

3.7 low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
EPSS
0.1% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 3rd percentile. Scored 2026-11-10. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
CISA's assessment (SSVC)
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial, assessed 2026-11-09. From CISA's Vulnrichment in the CVE List: whether it is exploited, whether exploiting it can be automated, and how much control it gives.
CWE
CWE-362 Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization (Race Condition)
OWASP Top 10
A06:2025 Insecure Design
Published
Modified
NVD analysis
Deferred: the NVD does not plan to analyze it
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

ChatGPTClaudeGoogle AI Mode

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-123128 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-123128?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-123128?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-123128 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

  • CAPEC-26 Leveraging Race Conditions Likelihood: High · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-29 Leveraging Time-of-Check and Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) Race Conditions Likelihood: High · Severity: High

The attack patterns MITRE's CAPEC relates to this record's weaknesses, as MITRE names them. Credits.

History

  1. The NVD deferred its analysis

Changes since this site first stored the record. The same for every record: /api/public/changes.

References

Check your stackJSON