CVSS 4.0
1.8 lowCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NCVE-2026-121564
Low (1.8) in lucasrodes whatstk. EPSS 0.3% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days.
Incomplete Comparison with Missing Factors (CWE-1023) in merge_chats() (whatstk/utils/chat_merge.py), reached from BaseChat.merge(), in whatstk from 0.3.0 before 0.9.0 allows a party that supplies the chat exports to cause messages to be absent from the merged output with no indication that anything was removed, because the merge keeps whole the chat whose first message is oldest and appends from the other only the messages that are strictly newer than the last message of the first. Every message of the second chat that falls inside the date range already covered by the first is therefore discarded. The two chats are compared on their date ranges and not on the identity of the individual messages, so a message held by only one of the two exports is dropped whenever its date falls inside the range of the other, and both branches of _merge_two_chats() behave this way. The merged result is returned without a warning and without a count of what was removed. This results in a merged chat that omits messages the inputs contain, in a library whose documented uses include forensic review and the generation of training data.
Severity
- EPSS
- 0.3% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 28th percentile. Scored 2026-11-10. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
- CISA's assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial, assessed 2026-11-03. From CISA's Vulnrichment in the CVE List: whether it is exploited, whether exploiting it can be automated, and how much control it gives.
- CWE
- CWE-1023 Incomplete Comparison with Missing Factors
- Published
- Modified
- NVD analysis
- Deferred: the NVD does not plan to analyze it
- Record from
- the NVD, synced
Ask an AI about this CVE
Show the prompt
Explain CVE-2026-121564 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-121564?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-121564?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-121564 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.
Affected
Versions
From the CNA's record in the CVE List.
| Product | Affected |
|---|---|
| lucasrodes whatstk | from 0.3.0 before 0.9.0 |