cve.bz

CVE-2026-120444

7.2 highEPSS 0.4%

High (7.2). EPSS 0.4% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days.

On this page
GoFound through 1.4.1 contains a path traversal vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary directories by supplying ../ sequences in the database parameter. Attackers can send GET requests to /api/db/create and /api/db/drop, directly or via a victim's browser, triggering os.RemoveAll on directories outside the data directory.

Severity

CVSS 4.0

7.2 high
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

CVSS 3.1

8.1 high
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
EPSS
0.4% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 35th percentile. Scored 2026-11-04. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
CWE
CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (Path traversal)
OWASP Top 10
A01:2025 Broken Access Control
Published
Modified
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

ChatGPTClaudeGoogle AI Mode

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-120444 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-120444?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-120444?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-120444 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

  • CAPEC-64 Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation Logic Likelihood: High · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-76 Manipulating Web Input to File System Calls Likelihood: High · Severity: Very High
  • CAPEC-78 Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate Encoding Likelihood: High · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-79 Using Slashes in Alternate Encoding Likelihood: High · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-126 Path Traversal Likelihood: High · Severity: Very High

The attack patterns MITRE's CAPEC relates to this record's weaknesses, as MITRE names them. Credits.

References

Check your stackJSON