cve.bz

CVE-2026-120151 PostgreSQL plpgsql record-field type confusion executes arbitrary code

8.8 highEPSS 0.6%

High (8.8). EPSS 0.6% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days.

On this page
Type confusion in PostgreSQL plpgsql record-field assignment allows an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via a reentrant domain CHECK that changes a RECORD variable's row type while a value is being cast. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.7, 17.12, 16.16, 15.20, and 14.25 are affected.

Severity

CVSS 3.1

8.8 high
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS
0.6% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 49th percentile. Scored 2026-11-13. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
CISA's assessment (SSVC)
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total, assessed 2026-11-12. From CISA's Vulnrichment in the CVE List: whether it is exploited, whether exploiting it can be automated, and how much control it gives.
CWE
CWE-843 Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type (Type Confusion)
Published
Modified
Assigned by
PostgreSQL (CNA)
NVD analysis
Awaiting analysis
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-120151 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-120151?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-120151?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-120151 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Badge for a README or a site

CVE-2026-120151

An image that stays current: it is drawn from the data each time it is fetched (a host that proxies images, as GitHub does, may show its copy for a while). Markdown:

[![CVE-2026-120151](https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-120151.svg)](https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-120151)

HTML:

<a href="https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-120151"><img src="https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-120151.svg" alt="CVE-2026-120151"></a>

Fix and patched versions

Linux distributions

DistributionReleasePackageFixed inAdvisory
Debian12postgresql-15no fix listedDEBIAN-CVE-2026-120151
Debian13postgresql-1717.12-0+deb13u1DEBIAN-CVE-2026-120151
Debian14postgresql-18no fix listedDEBIAN-CVE-2026-120151
Ubuntu20.04:LTSpostgresql-12no fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-120151
Ubuntu22.04:LTSpostgresql-14no fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-120151
Ubuntu24.04:LTSpostgresql-16no fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-120151
Ubuntu26.04:LTS, 26.10postgresql-18no fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-120151
UbuntuPro:14.04:LTSpostgresql-9.3no fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-120151
UbuntuPro:16.04:LTSpostgresql-9.5no fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-120151
UbuntuPro:18.04:LTSpostgresql-10no fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-120151
Red Hathummingbird:1libpq, libpq-devel0:18.7-0.1.hum1RHSA-2026:99821
Alpinev3.21, v3.22postgresql1515.20-r0ALPINE-CVE-2026-120151
Alpinev3.21, v3.22, v3.23 and 1 morepostgresql1616.16-r0ALPINE-CVE-2026-120151
Alpinev3.21, v3.22, v3.23 and 1 morepostgresql1717.12-r0ALPINE-CVE-2026-120151
Alpinev3.23, v3.24postgresql1818.7-r0ALPINE-CVE-2026-120151
Azure Linux3postgresqlno fix listedAZL-113777

From the distributions' data via OSV.dev: the Debian Security Tracker; Ubuntu Security Notices © Canonical Ltd., CC BY-SA 4.0; Red Hat Security Data © Red Hat, Inc., CC BY 4.0; the Alpine secdb, CC BY-SA 4.0; Microsoft's Azure Linux vulnerability data, MIT. Modified: reformatted and linked to CVE records. Credits. On the distributions' own pages: Debian · Ubuntu · Red Hat · Alpine.

Red Hat

Red Hat rates this Important.

Red Hat's statement

This vulnerability is rated as Important because an authenticated database user with permission to create database objects can escalate privileges and achieve arbitrary code execution as the PostgreSQL operating system service account. Although exploitation requires existing network access and non-trivial database creation privileges—precluding unauthenticated attackers—the flaw circumvents standard database engine isolation to fully compromise database host integrity and confidentiality. Standard hardened Red Hat Enterprise Linux deployments that restrict database object creation to administrative accounts substantially limit exposure to this flaw.

Red Hat's mitigation

Restrict network exposure of the PostgreSQL service to trusted client hosts and remove database object creation privileges from untrusted accounts:

1. Restrict client connections in `/var/lib/pgsql/data/pg_hba.conf` to authorized IP addresses only, then reload the database configuration:

```

systemctl reload postgresql

```

2. Revoke object creation permissions from untrusted database users on the public schema:

```

REVOKE CREATE ON SCHEMA public FROM PUBLIC;

```

Caveats: Restricting connection rules blocks access from unlisted clients. Revoking schema creation privileges prevents non-administrative users from defining custom tables, types, or PL/pgSQL functions, which may impact applications that perform dynamic schema changes.

Warning: Reloading the PostgreSQL service or modifying network filter rules applies changes immediately and can terminate or disrupt existing connections.

ProductPackageStateAdvisory
Red Hat Hardened ImageslibpqAffected
Red Hat Hardened Imagespostgresql17Affected
Red Hat Hardened Imagespostgresql18Affected

Contains Red Hat Security Data © Red Hat, Inc., licensed under CC BY 4.0. Source: https://access.redhat.com/security/data. Modified: reformatted. Red Hat's page for CVE-2026-120151.

References

Check your stackJSON