cve.bz

CVE-2026-120142 PostgreSQL dropped-column type confusion executes arbitrary code

8.8 highEPSS 0.6%

High (8.8). EPSS 0.6% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days.

On this page
Type confusion in PostgreSQL anonymous RECORD types allows an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via row types having dropped attributes in the same positions but with different widths or alignments. Within major versions 17-18, minor versions before PostgreSQL 18.7 and 17.12 are affected. Versions before PostgreSQL 17 are unaffected.

Severity

CVSS 3.1

8.8 high
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS
0.6% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 49th percentile. Scored 2026-11-13. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
CISA's assessment (SSVC)
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total, assessed 2026-11-12. From CISA's Vulnrichment in the CVE List: whether it is exploited, whether exploiting it can be automated, and how much control it gives.
CWE
CWE-843 Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type (Type Confusion)
Published
Modified
Assigned by
PostgreSQL (CNA)
NVD analysis
Awaiting analysis
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-120142 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-120142?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-120142?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-120142 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Badge for a README or a site

CVE-2026-120142

An image that stays current: it is drawn from the data each time it is fetched (a host that proxies images, as GitHub does, may show its copy for a while). Markdown:

[![CVE-2026-120142](https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-120142.svg)](https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-120142)

HTML:

<a href="https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-120142"><img src="https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-120142.svg" alt="CVE-2026-120142"></a>

Fix and patched versions

Linux distributions

DistributionReleasePackageFixed inAdvisory
Debian12postgresql-15no fix listedDEBIAN-CVE-2026-120142
Debian13postgresql-1717.12-0+deb13u1DEBIAN-CVE-2026-120142
Debian14postgresql-18no fix listedDEBIAN-CVE-2026-120142
Ubuntu20.04:LTSpostgresql-12no fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-120142
Ubuntu22.04:LTSpostgresql-14no fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-120142
Ubuntu24.04:LTSpostgresql-16no fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-120142
Ubuntu26.04:LTS, 26.10postgresql-18no fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-120142
UbuntuPro:14.04:LTSpostgresql-9.3no fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-120142
UbuntuPro:16.04:LTSpostgresql-9.5no fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-120142
UbuntuPro:18.04:LTSpostgresql-10no fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-120142
Red Hathummingbird:1libpq, libpq-devel0:18.7-0.1.hum1RHSA-2026:99821
Alpinev3.21, v3.22postgresql1515.20-r0ALPINE-CVE-2026-120142
Alpinev3.21, v3.22, v3.23 and 1 morepostgresql1616.16-r0ALPINE-CVE-2026-120142
Alpinev3.21, v3.22, v3.23 and 1 morepostgresql1717.12-r0ALPINE-CVE-2026-120142
Alpinev3.23, v3.24postgresql1818.7-r0ALPINE-CVE-2026-120142

From the distributions' data via OSV.dev: the Debian Security Tracker; Ubuntu Security Notices © Canonical Ltd., CC BY-SA 4.0; Red Hat Security Data © Red Hat, Inc., CC BY 4.0; the Alpine secdb, CC BY-SA 4.0. Modified: reformatted and linked to CVE records. Credits. On the distributions' own pages: Debian · Ubuntu · Red Hat · Alpine.

Red Hat

Red Hat rates this Important.

Red Hat's statement

This vulnerability is rated as Important rather than Critical because successful exploitation requires valid database credentials with permissions to define schema objects, preventing unauthenticated remote attackers from triggering the issue. Once authenticated with object creation privileges, a malicious user can achieve arbitrary code execution under the operating system account running the PostgreSQL service, leading to full compromise of database confidentiality, integrity, and availability. PostgreSQL deployments on versions prior to 17 are unaffected because they lack the vulnerable anonymous record handling logic.

Red Hat's mitigation

Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.

ProductPackageStateAdvisory
Red Hat Hardened ImageslibpqAffected
Red Hat Hardened Imagespostgresql17Affected
Red Hat Hardened Imagespostgresql18Affected

Contains Red Hat Security Data © Red Hat, Inc., licensed under CC BY 4.0. Source: https://access.redhat.com/security/data. Modified: reformatted. Red Hat's page for CVE-2026-120142.

References

Check your stackJSON