cve.bz

CVE-2026-120141 PostgreSQL materialized set-returning function type confusion executes arbitrary code

8.8 highEPSS 0.6%

High (8.8). EPSS 0.6% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days.

On this page
Type confusion in PostgreSQL materialized set-returning functions allows a database user to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via returning rows having different dynamic RECORD return types. json_populate_recordset() is one affected function. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.7, 17.12, 16.16, 15.20, and 14.25 are affected.

Severity

CVSS 3.1

8.8 high
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS
0.6% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 49th percentile. Scored 2026-11-13. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
CISA's assessment (SSVC)
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total, assessed 2026-11-12. From CISA's Vulnrichment in the CVE List: whether it is exploited, whether exploiting it can be automated, and how much control it gives.
CWE
CWE-843 Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type (Type Confusion)
Published
Modified
Assigned by
PostgreSQL (CNA)
NVD analysis
Awaiting analysis
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-120141 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-120141?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-120141?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-120141 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Badge for a README or a site

CVE-2026-120141

An image that stays current: it is drawn from the data each time it is fetched (a host that proxies images, as GitHub does, may show its copy for a while). Markdown:

[![CVE-2026-120141](https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-120141.svg)](https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-120141)

HTML:

<a href="https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-120141"><img src="https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-120141.svg" alt="CVE-2026-120141"></a>

Fix and patched versions

Linux distributions

DistributionReleasePackageFixed inAdvisory
Debian12postgresql-15no fix listedDEBIAN-CVE-2026-120141
Debian13postgresql-1717.12-0+deb13u1DEBIAN-CVE-2026-120141
Debian14postgresql-18no fix listedDEBIAN-CVE-2026-120141
Ubuntu20.04:LTSpostgresql-12no fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-120141
Ubuntu22.04:LTSpostgresql-14no fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-120141
Ubuntu24.04:LTSpostgresql-16no fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-120141
Ubuntu26.04:LTS, 26.10postgresql-18no fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-120141
UbuntuPro:14.04:LTSpostgresql-9.3no fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-120141
UbuntuPro:16.04:LTSpostgresql-9.5no fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-120141
UbuntuPro:18.04:LTSpostgresql-10no fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-120141
Red Hathummingbird:1libpq, libpq-devel0:18.7-0.1.hum1RHSA-2026:99821
Alpinev3.21, v3.22postgresql1515.20-r0ALPINE-CVE-2026-120141
Alpinev3.21, v3.22, v3.23 and 1 morepostgresql1616.16-r0ALPINE-CVE-2026-120141
Alpinev3.21, v3.22, v3.23 and 1 morepostgresql1717.12-r0ALPINE-CVE-2026-120141
Alpinev3.23, v3.24postgresql1818.7-r0ALPINE-CVE-2026-120141
Azure Linux3postgresqlno fix listedAZL-113753

From the distributions' data via OSV.dev: the Debian Security Tracker; Ubuntu Security Notices © Canonical Ltd., CC BY-SA 4.0; Red Hat Security Data © Red Hat, Inc., CC BY 4.0; the Alpine secdb, CC BY-SA 4.0; Microsoft's Azure Linux vulnerability data, MIT. Modified: reformatted and linked to CVE records. Credits. On the distributions' own pages: Debian · Ubuntu · Red Hat · Alpine.

Red Hat

Red Hat rates this Important.

Red Hat's statement

This vulnerability is rated as Important severity because an authenticated database user can achieve arbitrary code execution under the privileges of the operating system account running the PostgreSQL service. While exploiting the issue requires valid database credentials, it allows standard database users without superuser privileges to breach host boundaries and compromise the underlying operating system process. In Red Hat Enterprise Linux environments where databases serve multiple applications or untrusted tenants, this enables direct escalation from database access to local host compromise.

Red Hat's mitigation

Restrict network access to the PostgreSQL service so that only trusted client IP addresses can establish connections, and avoid provisioning database accounts to untrusted users.

1. Using firewalld, restrict PostgreSQL access (default port 5432/tcp) to trusted IP addresses or subnets:

```sh

firewall-cmd --permanent --remove-service=postgresql

firewall-cmd --permanent --zone=trusted --add-source=<trusted_ip_range>

firewall-cmd --reload

```

2. Alternatively, restrict client connection access in `/var/lib/pgsql/data/pg_hba.conf` to specific trusted addresses, then reload the service:

```sh

systemctl reload postgresql

```

Caveats:

Restricting network access limits exposure from untrusted networks, but any authenticated database user connecting from an authorized host can still trigger the vulnerability.

Warning: Reloading firewall configuration or the PostgreSQL service may momentarily interrupt active network connections. Verify that administrative management sources are included in trusted rules prior to reloading to avoid losing remote access.

ProductPackageStateAdvisory
Red Hat Hardened ImageslibpqAffected
Red Hat Hardened Imagespostgresql17Affected
Red Hat Hardened Imagespostgresql18Affected

Contains Red Hat Security Data © Red Hat, Inc., licensed under CC BY 4.0. Source: https://access.redhat.com/security/data. Modified: reformatted. Red Hat's page for CVE-2026-120141.

References

Check your stackJSON