The agent_memory module accepts a caller-supplied tenant parameter in create_client(tenant=...). Prior to version 0.50.0, the tenant parameter was not validated before being used to construct filesystem paths for secret resolution. A value containing path traversal sequences (for example, attacker-corp/../victim-corp) could cause the resolved path to escape the intended directory and access another tenant's secrets under:Plain Text/etc/secrets/appfnd/hana-agent-memory/<tenant>/Successful exploitation could allow unauthorized access to another tenant's mounted credentials, including OAuth client IDs and client secrets. This vulnerability could enable cross-tenant access to sensitive credentials.
Severity
CVSS 3.1
7.5 high
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
EPSS
0.4% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 39th percentile. Scored 2026-11-10. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
CWE
CWE-22Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (Path traversal)
Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-120013 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-120013?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-120013?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-120013 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.
Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.
Affected
sap_se:sap cloud sdk for python
Versions
From the CNA's record in the CVE List.
Product
Affected
SAP_SE SAP Cloud SDK for Python
< 0.50.0
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
CAPEC-64 Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation Logic Likelihood: High · Severity: High
CAPEC-76 Manipulating Web Input to File System Calls Likelihood: High · Severity: Very High
CAPEC-78 Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate Encoding Likelihood: High · Severity: High
CAPEC-79 Using Slashes in Alternate Encoding Likelihood: High · Severity: High
CAPEC-126 Path Traversal Likelihood: High · Severity: Very High
The attack patterns MITRE's CAPEC relates to this record's weaknesses, as MITRE names them. Credits.