cve.bz

CVE-2026-116615 Widget Options <= 4.2.6.1 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Code Injection via 'post_content' Parameter

8.8 highEPSS 1.0%

High (8.8) in marketingfire widget options – advanced conditional visibility for gutenberg blocks & classic widgets. EPSS 1.0% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days.

On this page
The Widget Options – Advanced Conditional Visibility for Gutenberg Blocks & Classic Widgets plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Code Injection in all versions up to, and including, 4.2.6.1 via the `post_content` parameter. This is due to asymmetric parsing between the save-time strip filter (`widgetopts_strip_logic_from_blocks()`) and the render-time parser (`blockopts_filter_before_display()`): embedding an inner `<!--start_widgetopts` literal inside a JSON key causes the write-side `json_decode` to see a non-`class` key and skip stripping — persisting the payload verbatim to the database — while the render-side `str_replace` reconstitutes the key to `class`, feeding the attacker-controlled `logic` value directly into `@eval`. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to inject PHP expressions that execute on every front-end page view, enabling boolean-oracle exfiltration of WordPress site configuration data — including admin email address, default role, and arbitrary `get_option`, `get_user_meta`, and `get_post_meta` values — via the plugin's allowlisted-function sandbox, which escalates to unrestricted code execution if any installed plugin extends the `widgetopts_allowed_php_functions` filter. Contributors can also exploit this vulnerability when their submitted post is later published by an administrator; notably, the injected payload executes for all site visitors, including unauthenticated users, because a trust-flag mechanism introduced in version 4.2.6 causes `widgetopts_safe_eval_trusted()` to bypass its non-admin short-circuit at every legacy render callsite. Exploitation by attackers with contributor-level access and above requires that an administrator (or editor) later publishes the contributor's submission. On a default installation, where that is not configured, the vulnerability requires attackers with author-level access and above.

Severity

CVSS 3.1

8.8 high
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS
1.0% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 62nd percentile. Scored 2026-11-13. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
CISA's assessment (SSVC)
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total, assessed 2026-11-13. From CISA's Vulnrichment in the CVE List: whether it is exploited, whether exploiting it can be automated, and how much control it gives.
CWE
CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code (Code Injection)
OWASP Top 10
A05:2025 Injection
Published
Modified
Assigned by
Wordfence (CNA)
NVD analysis
Deferred: the NVD does not plan to analyze it
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-116615 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-116615?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-116615?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-116615 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Badge for a README or a site

CVE-2026-116615

An image that stays current: it is drawn from the data each time it is fetched (a host that proxies images, as GitHub does, may show its copy for a while). Markdown:

[![CVE-2026-116615](https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-116615.svg)](https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-116615)

HTML:

<a href="https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-116615"><img src="https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-116615.svg" alt="CVE-2026-116615"></a>

Affected

  • marketingfire:widget options – advanced conditional visibility for gutenberg blocks & classic widgets

Versions

From the CNA's record in the CVE List.

ProductAffected
marketingfire Widget Options – Advanced Conditional Visibility for Gutenberg Blocks & Classic Widgetsthrough 4.2.6.1

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

  • CAPEC-35 Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executable Files Likelihood: High · Severity: Very High
  • CAPEC-77 Manipulating User-Controlled Variables Likelihood: High · Severity: Very High
  • CAPEC-242 Code Injection Likelihood: High · Severity: High

The attack patterns MITRE's CAPEC relates to this record's weaknesses, as MITRE names them. Credits.

History

  1. The NVD deferred its analysis

Changes since this site first stored the record. The same for every record: /api/public/changes.

References

Check your stackJSON