cve.bz

CVE-2026-111771

6.8 mediumEPSS 0.5%Fix available

Medium (6.8). EPSS 0.5% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days. Fixed in @modelcontextprotocol/sdk 1.32.0.

On this page
The Model Context Protocol TypeScript SDK provides TypeScript client and server implementations of the Model Context Protocol. From 1.6.0 until 1.32.0 in @modelcontextprotocol/sdk, from 2.0.0 until 2.3.0 in @modelcontextprotocol/server, from 2.0.0 until 2.0.2 in @modelcontextprotocol/express, and from 2.0.0 until 2.3.1 in @modelcontextprotocol/server-legacy, server-side bearer authentication could accept a valid access token issued for a different service because the SDK did not enforce the token audience. The affected surface is server-side HTTP bearer authentication. The trigger is a valid token whose audience names another service. The authorization server must issue tokens for multiple services, and the application's verifyAccessToken() must not independently validate aud. Applications already validating aud inside verifyAccessToken() are not affected. An attacker with a token for another service could authenticate to the MCP server and obtain the confidentiality and integrity capabilities granted to an authenticated caller. Upgrading alone leaves the new audience validation disabled. Operators must enable audience validation and provide the token audience together. Enabling only the expected audience check causes every request to receive HTTP 401. This issue is fixed in @modelcontextprotocol/sdk 1.32.0, @modelcontextprotocol/server 2.3.0, @modelcontextprotocol/express 2.0.2, and @modelcontextprotocol/server-legacy 2.3.1.

Severity

CVSS 3.1

6.8 medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
EPSS
0.5% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 46th percentile. Scored 2026-11-10. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
CISA's assessment (SSVC)
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total, assessed 2026-11-10. From CISA's Vulnrichment in the CVE List: whether it is exploited, whether exploiting it can be automated, and how much control it gives.
CWE
CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization
OWASP Top 10
A01:2025 Broken Access Control
Published
Modified
Assigned by
GitHub_M (CNA)
NVD analysis
Awaiting analysis
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-111771 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-111771?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-111771?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-111771 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Affected

Versions

From the CNA's record in the CVE List.

ProductAffected
modelcontextprotocol typescript-sdk>= 1.6.0, < 1.32.0
@modelcontextprotocol sdk>= 1.6.0, < 1.32.0
@modelcontextprotocol server>= 2.0.0, < 2.3.0
@modelcontextprotocol express>= 2.0.0, < 2.0.2
@modelcontextprotocol server-legacy>= 2.0.0, < 2.3.1

Packages (OSV)

AdvisoryEcosystemPackageAffectedFixed in
GHSA-rvq5-wwqv-78pqnpm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk>=1.6.0 <1.32.01.32.0
GHSA-rvq5-wwqv-78pqnpm@modelcontextprotocol/server>=2.0.0 <2.3.02.3.0
GHSA-rvq5-wwqv-78pqnpm@modelcontextprotocol/express>=2.0.0 <2.0.22.0.2
GHSA-rvq5-wwqv-78pqnpm@modelcontextprotocol/server-legacy>=2.0.0 <2.3.12.3.1

References

Check your stackJSON