CVSS 3.1
7.5 highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HHigh (7.5). EPSS 0.6% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days. Fixed in @modelcontextprotocol/sdk 1.32.0.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HExplain CVE-2026-111768 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-111768?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-111768?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-111768 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.
From the CNA's record in the CVE List.
| Product | Affected |
|---|---|
| modelcontextprotocol typescript-sdk | >= 1.3.0, < 1.32.0 |
| @modelcontextprotocol server | >= 2.0.0, < 2.3.0 |
| @modelcontextprotocol sdk | >= 1.3.0, < 1.32.0 |
| Advisory | Ecosystem | Package | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHSA-46jr-4wx8-v453 | npm | @modelcontextprotocol/sdk | >=1.3.0 <1.32.0 | 1.32.0 |
| GHSA-46jr-4wx8-v453 | npm | @modelcontextprotocol/server | >=2.0.0 <2.3.0 | 2.3.0 |
Red Hat rates this Important.
This vulnerability is rated as having Important impact because an unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger complete service unavailability through process termination via a single HTTP request that conforms to default body size limits. Deployments utilizing the stdio transport are unaffected, as the vulnerability is strictly confined to HTTP-based transport mechanisms. In environments exposing HTTP endpoints, the risk is elevated when services expose tools accepting array or dictionary structures without preceding upstream authentication or strict reverse-proxy payload size constraints.
To mitigate this vulnerability without applying code changes, implement one or more of the following operational controls:
1. Restrict transport exposure:
Run Model Context Protocol services using the stdio transport instead of HTTP where feasible. If HTTP endpoints are required, restrict network access to trusted hosts using network firewall rules or access control lists.
2. Enforce request body size limits at the reverse proxy or API gateway:
Place the application behind a reverse proxy (such as NGINX or Apache HTTP Server) or ingress controller and reduce the maximum permitted request body size to the minimum required for expected traffic. For example, in an upstream NGINX configuration:
```
client_max_body_size 256k;
```
Warning: Modifying reverse proxy or firewall configurations may require reloading or restarting the service (for example, `systemctl reload nginx`), which can cause temporary interruptions to active network sessions. Ensure the chosen payload limit is tested to avoid dropping valid application requests.
| Product | Package | State | Advisory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Hardened Images | grafana12.4 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | grafana13.1 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | grafana13.2 | Not affected |
Contains Red Hat Security Data © Red Hat, Inc., licensed under CC BY 4.0. Source: https://access.redhat.com/security/data. Modified: reformatted. Red Hat's page for CVE-2026-111768.
The attack patterns MITRE's CAPEC relates to this record's weaknesses, as MITRE names them. Credits. More on the page of CWE-770 (20).