cve.bz

CVE-2026-110021

6.9 medium

Medium (6.9).

PLCnext Engineer checks GSDX manifest reference digests but does not cryptographically verify the XML `SignatureValue` over canonicalized `SignedInfo`. An unauthenticated local attacker can modify signed GSDML content, update its manifest digest, retain the public certificate data, and leave an invalid nonempty `SignatureValue`. PLCnext Engineer prior to 2026.6 reports the package as `Valid` and selects the modified device description for import under the default policy.

Severity

CVSS 4.0

6.9 medium
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

CVSS 3.1

6.2 medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
CWE
CWE-347 Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
Published
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-110021 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-110021?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-110021?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-110021 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Versions

From the CNA's record in the CVE List.

ProductAffected
Phoenix Contact PLCnext Engineerfrom 0.0 before 2026.6

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

The attack patterns MITRE's CAPEC relates to this record's weaknesses, as MITRE names them. Credits.

References

Check your stackJSON