cve.bz

CVE-2026-109797

7.1 highEPSS 0.3%

High (7.1) in sap se sap/astonish. EPSS 0.3% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days.

On this page
In SAP/astonish, an authenticated user could potentially identify and operate on another team�s sandbox containers because of improper tenant isolation in the legacy Incus sandbox-management API handlers. The affected handlers did not use the tenant-aware session lookup path, allowing cross-tenant container operations such as listing, exposing or proxying, and deleting containers.The issue affects only the legacy Incus backend. Kubernetes and OpenShell deployments are not affected because the relevant Incus-specific handlers are unavailable there.

Severity

CVSS 3.1

7.1 high
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H
EPSS
0.3% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 17th percentile. Scored 2026-11-10. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
CWE
CWE-1220 Insufficient Granularity of Access Control
Published
Assigned by
sap (CNA)
NVD analysis
Awaiting analysis
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-109797 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-109797?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-109797?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-109797 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Affected

  • sap_se:sap/astonish

Versions

From the CNA's record in the CVE List.

ProductAffected
SAP_SE SAP/astonish<v3.6.0

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

  • CAPEC-1 Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs Likelihood: High · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-180 Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels Likelihood: High · Severity: Medium

The attack patterns MITRE's CAPEC relates to this record's weaknesses, as MITRE names them. Credits.

References

Check your stackJSON