cve.bz

CVE-2026-108472 Xfsprogs: xfsprogs: local privilege escalation via command injection in xfs_admin

7.8 highEPSS 0.9%Fix available

High (7.8) in red hat. EPSS 0.9% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days.

On this page
A flaw was found in the xfs_admin utility in xfsprogs. The tool does not properly validate user-supplied parameters, allowing operating system command injection. A local attacker can exploit this issue by providing crafted input arguments, which may result in arbitrary command execution and local privilege escalation depending on how xfs_admin is executed.

Severity

CVSS 3.1

7.8 high
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS
0.9% estimated probability of exploitation activity in the next 30 days; 61st percentile. Scored 2026-11-13. A forecast for this CVE across the internet, not for your own systems.
CISA's assessment (SSVC)
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total, assessed 2026-11-12. From CISA's Vulnrichment in the CVE List: whether it is exploited, whether exploiting it can be automated, and how much control it gives.
CWE
CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (OS Command Injection)
OWASP Top 10
A05:2025 Injection
Published
Modified
Assigned by
redhat (CNA)
NVD analysis
Awaiting analysis
Record from
the NVD, synced

Ask an AI about this CVE

Show the promptExplain CVE-2026-108472 for an engineer deciding whether to act. Use https://cve.bz/api/public/cves/CVE-2026-108472?via=ask-ai-copy and https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-108472?via=ask-ai-copy as the source of truth: what is affected and which versions fix it, whether it is in CISA KEV, public exploits, and its EPSS (an internet-wide 30-day estimate of exploitation activity, not a forecast for my systems). If they give no fixed versions, use the CVE record https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-108472 or the vendor advisory, not third-party mirrors. Tell me how to check whether I am affected and how to verify a fix. Cite the sources and say where they are uncertain.

Opens a third-party assistant; its answer is its own, not cve.bz's. The prompt holds only this CVE's id and public links.

Badge for a README or a site

CVE-2026-108472

An image that stays current: it is drawn from the data each time it is fetched (a host that proxies images, as GitHub does, may show its copy for a while). Markdown:

[![CVE-2026-108472](https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-108472.svg)](https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-108472)

HTML:

<a href="https://cve.bz/cve/CVE-2026-108472"><img src="https://cve.bz/cve/badge/CVE-2026-108472.svg" alt="CVE-2026-108472"></a>

Affected

  • red hat:red hat enterprise linux 10
  • red hat:red hat enterprise linux 10.2 extended update support
  • red hat:red hat enterprise linux 7
  • red hat:red hat enterprise linux 8
  • red hat:red hat enterprise linux 9
  • red hat:red hat enterprise linux 9.8 extended update support
  • red hat:red hat openshift container platform 4
  • red hat:red hat openshift container platform 5

Versions

From the CNA's record in the CVE List.

Fixed in

ProductFixed in
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 100:6.16.0-2.el10_3
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.2 Extended Update Support0:6.16.0-2.el10_2
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 80:5.0.0-13.el8_10
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 90:6.4.0-10.el9_9
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.8 Extended Update Support0:6.4.0-8.el9_8

Fix and patched versions

  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10: fixed in 0:6.16.0-2.el10_3
  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.2 Extended Update Support: fixed in 0:6.16.0-2.el10_2
  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8: fixed in 0:5.0.0-13.el8_10
  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9: fixed in 0:6.4.0-10.el9_9
  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.8 Extended Update Support: fixed in 0:6.4.0-8.el9_8
  • Red Hat, Rocky Linux: fixed package versions per release

Linux distributions

DistributionReleasePackageFixed inAdvisory
Debian12, 13, 14xfsprogsno fix listedDEBIAN-CVE-2026-108472
Ubuntu14.04:LTS, 16.04:LTS, 18.04:LTS and 5 morexfsprogsno fix listedUBUNTU-CVE-2026-108472
Red Hatenterprise_linux:8::baseosxfsprogs, xfsprogs-devel, xfsprogs-debuginfo and 1 more0:5.0.0-13.el8_10RHSA-2026:99817
Red Hatenterprise_linux:9::appstreamxfsprogs-devel, xfsprogs-debuginfo, xfsprogs-xfs_scrub and 2 more0:6.4.0-10.el9_9RHSA-2026:99661
Red Hatenterprise_linux:9::baseosxfsprogs, xfsprogs-debuginfo, xfsprogs-debugsource and 1 more0:6.4.0-10.el9_9RHSA-2026:99661
Red Hatenterprise_linux:10.3xfsprogs, xfsprogs-devel, xfsprogs-debuginfo and 3 more0:6.16.0-2.el10_3RHSA-2026:99660
Red Hatenterprise_linux_eus:10.2xfsprogs, xfsprogs-devel, xfsprogs-debuginfo and 3 more0:6.16.0-2.el10_2RHSA-2026:99659
Red Hatrhel_eus:9.8::appstreamxfsprogs-devel, xfsprogs-debuginfo, xfsprogs-xfs_scrub and 2 more0:6.4.0-8.el9_8RHSA-2026:99662
Red Hatrhel_eus:9.8::baseosxfsprogs, xfsprogs-debuginfo, xfsprogs-debugsource and 1 more0:6.4.0-8.el9_8RHSA-2026:99662
Rocky Linux9xfsprogs, xfsprogs-devel, xfsprogs-debuginfo and 3 more0:6.4.0-10.el9_9RLSA-2026:99661
Rocky Linux10xfsprogs, xfsprogs-devel, xfsprogs-debuginfo and 3 more0:6.16.0-2.el10_3RLSA-2026:99660

From the distributions' data via OSV.dev: the Debian Security Tracker; Ubuntu Security Notices © Canonical Ltd., CC BY-SA 4.0; Red Hat Security Data © Red Hat, Inc., CC BY 4.0; Rocky Linux's errata, BSD-3-Clause. Modified: reformatted and linked to CVE records. Credits. On the distributions' own pages: Debian · Ubuntu · Red Hat.

Red Hat

Red Hat rates this Important.

Red Hat's statement

This vulnerability is rated as Important because unauthorized local users who are able to supply parameters to xfs_admin through administrative delegation or automated provisioning tools can achieve arbitrary command execution and privilege escalation. On standard Red Hat Enterprise Linux installations, storage maintenance utilities are restricted to administrative accounts, preventing direct exposure to unprivileged users. However, in environments where untrusted inputs are passed to xfs_admin without proper validation, an attacker can compromise the host with the permissions of the executing process.

Red Hat's mitigation

Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.

ProductPackageStateAdvisory
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10xfsprogsAffected
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7xfsprogsAffected
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8xfsprogsAffected
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9xfsprogsAffected
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-8Affected
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9Affected
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 5openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9Affected

Contains Red Hat Security Data © Red Hat, Inc., licensed under CC BY 4.0. Source: https://access.redhat.com/security/data. Modified: reformatted. Red Hat's page for CVE-2026-108472.

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

  • CAPEC-6 Argument Injection Likelihood: High · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-15 Command Delimiters Likelihood: High · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-43 Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers Likelihood: Medium · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-88 OS Command Injection Likelihood: High · Severity: High
  • CAPEC-108 Command Line Execution through SQL Injection Likelihood: Low · Severity: Very High

The attack patterns MITRE's CAPEC relates to this record's weaknesses, as MITRE names them. Credits.

References

Check your stackJSON