{"cve":"CVE-2026-72466","nvd":{"published":"2026-08-15T06:22:20.637","modified":"2026-10-16T19:17:31.700","status":"Received","description":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nxprtrdma: Fix bcall rep leak and unbounded peek\n\nrpcrdma_is_bcall() decodes a reply's first words to decide whether\nthe frame is a backchannel call. Two issues in that decode path\nlet a short or malformed reply leak the receive buffer and drain\nthe Receive queue.\n\nFirst, the speculative peek\n\n    p = xdr_inline_decode(xdr, 0);\n    /* five p++ reads follow */\n\nasks xdr_inline_decode() for zero bytes, which returns xdr->p\nwithout consulting xdr->end. The five subsequent __be32 reads can\nthen walk up to 20 bytes past the wire payload into stale regbuf\ncontents and misclassify the reply as a backchannel call.\n\nSecond, after the post-peek\n\n    p = xdr_inline_decode(xdr, 3 * sizeof(*p));\n    if (unlikely(!p))\n            return true;\n\nthe short-header arm returns true without calling\nrpcrdma_bc_receive_call(). The contract with the caller is that a\ntrue return transfers ownership of rep to the backchannel path:\n\n    rpcrdma_reply_handler()\n      if (rpcrdma_is_bcall(r_xprt, rep))\n              return;        /* bare return, skips out_post */\n      ...\n    out_post:\n      rpcrdma_post_recvs(r_xprt, credits + ...);\n\nBecause rpcrdma_bc_receive_call() never ran, no one took rep, but\nrpcrdma_reply_handler still bare-returns past rpcrdma_rep_put()\nand rpcrdma_post_recvs(). The rep, with its persistently\nDMA-mapped receive buffer, is orphaned on rb_all_reps and freed\nonly at transport teardown. This completion reposts nothing, so\nits slot is reclaimed only when a later forward-channel reply\nreaches out_post and rpcrdma_post_recvs() allocates a fresh rep to\nbackfill; absent that traffic the Receive queue drains and the\npeer's Sends draw RNR NAKs.\n\nFix by consulting xdr->end after the zero-length peek so the five\n__be32 reads cannot run unless 20 bytes of wire payload remain. A\nbyte-precise comparison against xdr->end is required because a\nnon-4-aligned receive rounds the stream's word count up past the\ntrue payload. Also return false from the short-header arm so the\nreply falls through the normal out_norqst cleanup chain\n(rpcrdma_rep_put() plus rpcrdma_post_recvs()).","cvss_v4":null,"cvss_v3":{"version":"3.1","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","score":9.8},"cwes":[],"references":["https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/07aa506436be7634e381e1e1f6d0efa9efc81ecc","https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0cee8f9c3b14bd6dee9c4310090a7f45b89b834f","https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/118a16a18c59f7ad8084b2d13988839b669fca10","https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7afc2f8d2fd9394724df9eaf22ce7a71029a5fba","https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/88b5346284a184a6b7d019912232a571d672d3e3"],"products":[],"source":"nvd","synced_at":"2026-10-19T22:48:17.459049833+00:00"},"epss":{"cve":"CVE-2026-72466","score":0.00738,"percentile":0.54233,"date":"2026-10-25"},"kev":null,"osv":[],"attribution":["This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.","EPSS scores: FIRST Exploit Prediction Scoring System, https://www.first.org/epss","Known exploited vulnerabilities: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog, https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog","Package advisories: OSV (https://osv.dev), from the GitHub Advisory Database, PyPA, Go, RustSec and other ecosystem databases, under CC-BY 4.0 or CC0","CVE records: the CVE Program's CVE List (https://www.cve.org), under its terms of use (https://www.cve.org/Legal/TermsOfUse). CVE is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation; this product is not affiliated with the CVE Program."]}