{"cve":"CVE-2026-64109","nvd":{"published":"2026-07-19T16:17:52.233","modified":"2026-10-19T21:17:23.517","status":"Modified","description":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\naf_unix: Fix UAF read of tail->len in unix_stream_data_wait()\n\nunix_stream_data_wait() does skb_peek_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue) without\nholding any lock that prevents SKBs on that queue from being dequeued and\nfreed.\nThis has been the case since commit 79f632c71bea (\"unix/stream: fix\npeeking with an offset larger than data in queue\").\nThe first consequence of this is that the pointer comparison\n`tail != last` can be false even if `last` semantically refers to an\nalready-freed SKB while `tail` is a new SKB allocated at the same address;\nwhich can cause unix_stream_data_wait() to wrongly keep blocking after new\ndata has arrived, but only in a weird scenario where a peeking recv() and\na normal recv() on the same socket are racing, which is probably not a\nreal problem.\n\nBut since commit 2b514574f7e8 (\"net: af_unix: implement splice for stream\naf_unix sockets\"), `tail` is actually dereferenced, which can cause UAF in\nthe following race scenario (where test_setup() runs single-threaded,\nand afterwards, test_thread1() and test_thread2() run concurrently in\ntwo threads:\n```\nstatic int socks[2];\nvoid test_setup(void) {\n  socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, socks);\n  send(socks[1], \"A\", 1, 0);\n  int peekoff = 1;\n  setsockopt(socks[0], SOL_SOCKET, SO_PEEK_OFF, &peekoff, sizeof(peekoff));\n}\nvoid test_thread1(void) {\n  char dummy;\n  recv(socks[0], &dummy, 1, MSG_PEEK);\n}\nvoid test_thread2(void) {\n  char dummy;\n  recv(socks[0], &dummy, 1, 0);\n  shutdown(socks[1], SHUT_WR);\n}\n```\n\nwhen racing like this:\n```\nthread1                       thread2\nunix_stream_read_generic\n  mutex_lock(&u->iolock)\n  skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue)\n  skb_peek_next(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue)\n  mutex_unlock(&u->iolock)\n                              unix_stream_read_generic\n                                unix_state_lock(sk)\n                                skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue)\n                                unix_state_unlock(sk)\n  unix_stream_data_wait\n    unix_state_lock(sk)\n    tail = skb_peek_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue)\n                                spin_lock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock)\n                                __skb_unlink(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue)\n                                spin_unlock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock)\n                                consume_skb(skb) [frees the SKB]\n    `tail != last`: false\n    `tail`: true\n    `tail->len != last_len` ***UAF***\n```\n\nFix the UAF by removing the read of tail->len; checking tail->len would\nonly make sense if SKBs in the receive queue of a UNIX socket could grow,\nwhich can no longer happen.\n\nKuniyuki explained:\n\n> When commit 869e7c62486e (\"net: af_unix: implement stream sendpage\n> support\") added sendpage() support, data could be appended to the last\n> skb in the receiver's queue.\n>\n> That's why we needed to check if the length of the last skb was changed\n> while waiting for new data in unix_stream_data_wait().\n>\n> However, commit a0dbf5f818f9 (\"af_unix: Support MSG_SPLICE_PAGES\") and\n> commit 57d44a354a43 (\"unix: Convert unix_stream_sendpage() to use\n> MSG_SPLICE_PAGES\") refactored sendmsg(), and now data is always added\n> to a new skb.\n\nThat means this fix is not suitable for kernels before 6.5.","cvss_v4":null,"cvss_v3":{"version":"3.1","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H","score":8.8},"cwes":["CWE-416"],"references":["https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/26342087fac93b3932e6af61dc91ec029cb8a623","https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/38bccb927d83d7d52e5b20015a172a0b6101d11e","https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5f162f95a95834f06a8ec6140889272ad12e842f","https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/acdff9907478e82208475b1151700d0b71dcdc63","https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/be309f8eae8b474a4a617eaae01324da996fc719"],"products":["linux:linux_kernel"],"source":"nvd","synced_at":"2026-10-21T03:43:09.190223697+00:00"},"epss":{"cve":"CVE-2026-64109","score":0.00129,"percentile":0.02523,"date":"2026-10-25"},"kev":null,"osv":[],"attribution":["This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.","EPSS scores: FIRST Exploit Prediction Scoring System, https://www.first.org/epss","Known exploited vulnerabilities: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog, https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog","Package advisories: OSV (https://osv.dev), from the GitHub Advisory Database, PyPA, Go, RustSec and other ecosystem databases, under CC-BY 4.0 or CC0","CVE records: the CVE Program's CVE List (https://www.cve.org), under its terms of use (https://www.cve.org/Legal/TermsOfUse). CVE is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation; this product is not affiliated with the CVE Program."]}